To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister
2019-09-03: Dear Sir,
The fact of accusation of this case is that the “incident”
of the “immigration law violation” that occurs
on a daily basis is forcibly “disguised” as a crime.
Japanese parliamentarians do not understand this obvious illegal act.
The “power” of the international community is necessary.
Please, foreigner, please explain to Japanese in English.
Part 1. Prosecutors say that “supporters” of “illegal employment” are as follows.
The “Embassy staff” issued to the Philippine people the “lie fake documents” stipulated
in Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act.
However, what the “Embassy staff” did was support the “Revocation of Status
of Residence” Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act.
Violators of Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act will be administratively disposed of
by the Minister of Justice.
It is “Revocation of status of residence” and “Exiting abroad”.
Therefore, it cannot be “applied” to “crime that supported other crimes”
in “Articles 60 and 62”.
This fact should be “reported” to the Minister of Justice.
Check the “reason for crime” in the “bill of indictment”.
In this case, “application of immigration law” has priority over application
of criminal law due to “logic of law”.
Constitutional provisions cannot “punish” the “administrative disposition”
of “deportation” by the Minister of Justice.
It is scary Japan that there are a lot of parliamentarians who cannot understand this logic.
Even more crucial is that
1) Since I received a "lie-fake employment contract" from an "Embassy employee",
I was able to easily obtain "Resident status".
2) I was able to live in Japan because I got a “resident status”.
3) Because they were able to live in Japan, they were able to “illegal labor”.
4) Therefore, the person who “granted” a “lie fake employment contract”
to a foreigner shall be a “supporter”
for “violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act”.
This is crazy.
This is "document written judgment" written by a Japanese judge.
Please see this on the website!
But I tell crazy judges.
1) Suppose you have obtained a "resident status" from a "lie-false employment contract".
2) However, if they do “work” within the scope of “residence status”,
they will not violate the “Immigration Act Article 70”.
3) The Immigration Act Article 70 and the Immigration Act Article 22-4- (4) are different logics.
That is why the Diet is making Article 73-2 of Immigration Law.
In 2004, Immigration Act Article 22-4 “Revocation
of Status of Residence” was established to “prevent” Immigration Act Article 73-2.
This is not currently understood by Japanese lawyers and parliamentarians.
I would like to ask the international community.
I don't hear Japanese people say.
Please explain to your Japanese as a foreigner in English.
Continue to next week.
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.
But crazy.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers who are “causal”
of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.
2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.
A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4 (Acquisition of status
of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.
The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.
The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
Yasuhiro Nagano
PS:
There are many American victims. I have seen this with my eyes.
If the prosecution does not arrest the employer, the Americans are not guilty.
The United States government should claim restoration and compensation
for the honor of Americans.
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."
It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/
Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
