Japan's Justice in the Dark

Please support so that Japan will be governed under the law, fundamental human rights will be protected, and it will become a country complying with international law

SOSオピニオン To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister 2019-09-13: Dear Sir,The Vietnamese government should ask the Japanese government for “recovery of honor” and “compensation” for the Vietnamese people.

To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister


2019-09-13: Dear Sir,
A violation of the immigration law of the Japanese government.
Recently, the number of Vietnamese victims has increased rapidly.
Japan has ratified human rights treaties.
The Vietnamese government should ask the Japanese government for “recovery of honor”
and “compensation” for the Vietnamese people.

Part 1. The purpose of the investigation is to make the supporters
of Article 22-4- (4) Immigration Law a criminal offender.
1) The Filipinos gained a “residence status” in response to the “support”
in Article 22-4- (4) “Revocation of Status of Residence”.
Specifically, they received a “lie-false employment contract”.
2) Filipinos were able to easily obtain “resident status”.
3) The Filipinos were able to stay in Japan.
4) The Filipinos were able to do “illegal labor”.
It is a premise that a foreigner will commit a crime if they live in Japan.

The police are doing an unreasonable investigation to “send”
to the “Yokohama Prosecutor's Office”
The act of issuing a “lie-false employment contract” is illegal
because it is a “cancellation of status of residence”
and has no causal relationship with “illegal labor” and is not a crime.

“The purpose of the crime” of the police officer “abuses” the “intent”
of the Immigration Act 22-4- (4) “Revocation of Status of Residence”,
which was established in 2004 to prevent the promotion of illegal employment .

In this case, the “4 Chinese” who were punished
in violation of the immigration law in 2010
(non-qualified activities) were sentenced to imprisonment
for violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
And “Kingungaku and I” were sentenced to “prison” under “Articles 60 and 62”.
It is exactly the same as this “method”. .

In this immigration law violation, the citizens of many countries have been sacrificed.
I “know” are Chinese and Philippine.
About them, I submitted a “bill of indictment” to the prosecutor's office
on behalf of the Chinese government and the Philippines government.
They “to crush” “bill of indictment”.

The Chinese government and the Philippine government should ask the Japanese government
for "recovery of honor" and "reparations" for victims.
Victims should demand “National Rights” from their “government”.

The Vietnamese government should “claim” the Japanese government's violation
of international law and demand Vietnamese “recovery of honor” and “compensation”.
I am e-mailing daily explanations to the Vietnamese Embassy.
Why doesn't the Vietnamese government “request” the Japanese government?
Was it "fallen" in the Japanese government's honey trap?
If so, the Vietnamese people will get angry.
The Vietnamese government should act before the Vietnamese speak out throughout Vietnam.

Continue to next week.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery
and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing"
only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds of “support
of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes” in Articles 60
and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
There are many American victims. I have seen this with my eyes.
If the prosecution does not arrest the employer, the Americans are not guilty.
The United States government should claim restoration and compensation
for the honor of Americans.
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp