2019-10-21: Dear Sir,
You are dangerous when you come to Japan. Japan's "security" is good.
But Japan's “special civil servant” makes you a criminal even if you don't commit any crime.
Many foreigners are “victims”. Lucky foreigners have returned home safely.
If you want to be a “Uighur”, come to Japan.
Part 1. From this week, we will explain about the malicious intentional “criminal act”
of “special civil servants” and “intentional” of “indictment facts”.
For violations of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law, it will be stated on another day.
Here, we describe the “criminal facts” that a third party
who is not Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act has become a “supporter”
for violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
The prosecution criminalizes the third party as a supporter
for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act for Foreigners."
The reason for the crime is the act of supporting "Immigration Law Article 22-4-4".
Therefore, it is made a "prison sentence" under Article 60 and Article 62 of the Penal Code.
As already explained, police officers, prosecutors and judges clearly violate the following laws:
Criminal Code Article 172 "Crimes of False Complaints".
Criminal Code Article 194 “abuse of authority by special public officer”.
“Crimes of False Complaints”.
Article 172 A person who makes a false complaint, accusation or other declaration
for the purpose of causing a person to be subject to criminal
or disciplinary action shall be punished by imprisonment with work
for not less than three months but not more than ten years.
“Abuse of Authority by Special public officers”.
Article 194 If a person who performs a judicial, prosecution,
or police duty, or a person who assists these duties,
misuses his / her authority and arrests or confines a person,
the period of six months or more and ten years or less Punished by imprisonment or imprisonment.
The crime that a “person who judges people by law” violates the law is a “felony”.
It will continue tomorrow.
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
2) Criminal law
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.
2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds
of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.
A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4 (Acquisition of status of residence
by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes” in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.
The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.
The materials are below.
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
There are many American victims. I have seen this with my eyes.
If the prosecution does not arrest the employer, the Americans are not guilty.
The United States government should claim restoration and compensation
for the honor of Americans.
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."
Please contact us if you have any questions.