2019-12-05: Dear Sir,
I continue to post “same content” on SNS. The Japanese lost “justice”. The encouragement of foreigners is “happy”. This issue will not be resolved unless each country legislates a bill seeking “governance under Japanese human rights and law”.
Part 1. We will explain our “innocence” in “Bill of indictment” of “I and Kingungaku”.
I will explain in the order described in “Indictment, bill of indictment”.
The prosecution states in the same way about the four violators
of the Immigration Act Article 70 "Labor outside the status of residence".
“One person” consists of the following.
1) The prosecution states the fact that the Chinese did Article 70 “Labor outside the status
of residence” under the Immigration Control Act.
2) The prosecution states that "I" created "false documents = contract documents
for false employment."
3) The prosecution states that the above documents were “provided” to Chinese
by Kingungaku, a Chinese.
4) The prosecution stated the fact that the Chinese submitted to the Tokyo Immigration Bureau
with “false documents” attached.
Although not listed, the Chinese have obtained a “resident status”.
This leads to the fact that the first immigration law article 70 “Labor outside the status
of residence” was done.
The judge explains the “causality” in the “judgment”.
1) The Chinese were provided with “false documents”.
2) The Chinese were able to obtain “residence status”.
3) The Chinese were able to stay in Japan.
4) Since the Chinese were able to live in Japan, they were able to work
in violation of the Immigration Act Article 70.
5) Therefore, “causal relationship” is “clear”
between “providing” “false documents” and “violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act”.
This reasoning is a “reason” that forcibly “leads” the “conclusion”.
When a foreigner lives in Japan,
he / she concludes that he / she will commit a crime “This thought” is a violation of human rights.
The important thing is the “causality” error.
I say before that.
Violation of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act is an administrative punishment
by the Minister of Justice, so criminal law cannot be applied.
Return to the “causality” error.
Suppose you have obtained a "resident status" with a "false document".
If they work within the scope of “Residence Status”,
they will not be “labor outside the status of residence”
in violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
However, as stipulated by the Immigration Control Law,
the cause and effect of violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Law “Unqualified Labor” lies
in Article 72-2 “Crime to Promote Illegal Labor”.
The judge does not understand the meaning of the “immigration law” at all.
It will continue tomorrow.
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site"
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
2) Criminal law
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
`` Revised November 4, 2019 ''
I'm not only Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims in the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under the Immigration Act Article 73-2
(a crime that promotes illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to Article 14 “Principles of Equality under the Law”
of the Japanese Constitution.
It violates international law that prohibits "consciously" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent". .
2. The prosecution “applied” the crimes supporting other crimes in Articles 60
and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act on the grounds
of “supporting the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4” Is an error in the law.
"Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law" is the disposal of those
who have obtained the status of residence through fake application.
Previously, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties
for those who obtained status of residence through false applications (Article 70, Article 74-6).
The Amended Immigration Act was enacted at the 192nd Special Diet session
for those who obtained status of residence through falsification applications,
office workers who helped them, lawyers, administrative scriveners, and school staff.
“Effective from January 1, 2017”.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat and Philippine embassy employee" is 100% "innocent".
“Reference”: Foreigners acted in accordance with Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “Indictment” is not causal to Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The prosecutor is "crush something in one's hand".
However, “crush something in one's hand” by the state power is “stop”
of “aging, statistics of limitations”.
The materials are below.
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue. I am waiting for the result I hope that there is no lie.
Please e-mail if the URL of the document web is as shown below. (Return a private URL).
Please contact us if you have any questions.