To President Trump
2019-12-27: Dear Sir,
North Korea is already a “owner” of “nuclear weapons”. The United States should allow North Korea to own “nuclear weapons”. If we can't accept it, we should not admit Israel, India, Pakistan's “nuclear weapons”. Iran should also be allowed to develop “nuclear weapons”. The rest is "Kesera Sera". President Trump should “decide”!
Part 1. On December 16, 2019, according to Reuters,
the US Special Representative for Vegan North Korea called
on North Korea to respond to requests for US dialogue on the 16th.
Regarding North Korea's request for a concession on the US side with a “year-end deadline,”
he said, “the US side has no deadline.
He stressed “a positive US attitude” to discuss “all concerns”.
He spoke at a joint meeting with South Korea ’s Director General
of Peace Negotiations on the Korean Peninsula.
North Korea has recently strengthened its stance by conducting weapons tests one after another
and resuming condemnation against US President Trump.
"Changing the way. It's not too late"
and then "creating a lot to create a flexible negotiation
through a feasible stage towards a balanced agreement that meets both objectives."
We have proposed a simple method. "
This month, North Korea criticized the United States “even if they have a dialogue”,
the US “have no suggestions”.
Experts expressed the view that North Korea is extremely
unlikely to respond to Mr. Vegan's call for dialogue.
Shin Beom-chul, Senior Fellow at the Ulsan Policy Research Institute
in South Korea, effectively challenged the supreme leader
from the North ’s perspective that “Vegan“ bounced the end of the year ” "It will be."
Kim Dong-yub, a professor at Kyungnam University in South Korea, said,
“North Korea will not respond to the dialogue unless it promises a clear concession instead
of calling for a meeting only for the US to meet.”
What does the US want to say?
The US is a good “double standard” and is requesting North Korea to give up its nuclear weapons.
The US does not allow nuclear possession except in five major countries.
The US responded strictly to “Syria”.
The United States allows Israel, India, and Pakistan nuclear possessions with exceptions.
North Korea, like Israel, India, and Pakistan, claims nuclear possession.
Even if the United States moves the United Nations to punish economic sanctions,
the North Korean people are “bearing suffering”.
Exactly, “Shin nakuba kuni tatazu”.
We do not want to imagine “the suffering of the North Korean people” any more.
President Trump should make a decision. The answer is “one in two”.
(A) Accept North Korea's request.
(B) Bombing North Korea and extinguishing North Korea.
Many people in the world say.
The US lost the Vietnam War.
The US will lose again.
President Trump has no choice but to “select (A)”.
If President Trump grants North Korea and Iraq “nuclear possession”,
the world will be peaceful for a while.
The rest is "Kesera Sera".
Continue to next week.
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
2) Criminal law
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
`` Revised November 4, 2019 ''
I'm not only Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims in the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to Article 14 “Principles of Equality under the Law”
of the Japanese Constitution.
It violates international law that prohibits "consciously" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent". .
2. The prosecution applied “applying” the crimes supporting other crimes
in Article 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4”.
Is an error in the law.
"Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law" is the disposal of those
who have obtained the status of residence through fake application.
Previously, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties
for those who obtained status of residence through false applications (Article 70, Article 74-6).
The revised Immigration Control Law was enacted at the 192nd Diet session
for those who obtained status of residence through falsification applications,
office workers who helped them, lawyers, administrative scriveners, and school staff.
“Effective from January 1, 2017”.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat and Philippine embassy employee" is 100% "innocent".
“Reference”: Foreigners acted in accordance with Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The prosecutor is "crush something in one's hand".
However, “crush something in one's hand” by the state power is “stop”
of “aging, statistics of limitations”.
The materials are below.
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue. I am waiting for the result I hope that there is no lie.
Please e-mail if the URL of the document web is as shown below. (Return a private URL).
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!