To President Trump
2020-02-27: Dear Sirs,
Nissan Motors held an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders on February 18.
I think it's better to disband Nissan Motors that can't maintain compliance.
The crime of Carlos Ghosn is a company-wide crime.
Nissan has made only foreigners criminal.
Nissan has not disposed of former President Hiroto Nishikawa and "the employees
and officers involved in the incident." The cause lies not only in executives
but also in trade unions.
The Nissan trade union may have made "Nissan" "crazy". You can't buy a Nissan car right now.
Part 1. Nissan Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders,
New President Uchida Receives “Baptism” from Shareholders with “Preparedness” for Dismissal
The Nissan Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders,
which lasted about two hours and forty minutes, is covered
in detail in today's newspapers. Newspapers are strictly commentary.
The full text is below.
Carlos Ghosn's case is a "company-wide" crime.
Nissan is a “listed company”.
Listed companies have in-house systems that do not allow illegal spending.
Payments of 1 yen or 1 dollar will be made according to strict internal regulations.
I think the prosecutor's claim of "payment outcome" is true.
However, "listed companies" cannot make such payments.
Within Nissan, even union members, flat employees, were complicit in the case.
Of course, my boss is also involved.
If the payment is required by the board of directors of any company,
the voucher will be checked and the minutes of the board of directors will be processed.
All of this can be understood by anyone who has worked for a listed company.
Companies have an "audit department" in addition to corporate auditors.
The Audit Department confirms this.
All involved were aware of the compliance breach.
Why did prosecutors get involved in "compliance violations" of private companies?
It is unknown whether there was any question regarding "compliance violation"
at the general meeting of shareholders.
Non-compliance company organizations commit crimes again.
I have been buying Nissan cars for many years.
Unfortunately, even a company with excellent technology, "a company that cannot comply" should disappear.
This time, it is a crime by "illegal" of "paperwork".
However, this leads to "injustice" of "manufacturing".
What is missing from Nissan employees and executives is justice.
Nissan has done the same in the past.
Nissan Motor is once more "I've done it."
Prior to the arrival of Carlos Ghosn, Nissan was dominated by Nissan by "the nobleman of labor."
If the "U.S. Auto Workers Union" "Executives and members" hear this story, they will be "amazed."
It will continue tomorrow.
Please see "bill of indictment" で at the "Site" below.
In this case, only by looking at this "bill of indictment",
you can understand the "error of applicable law".
Please see the "English translation" and "Japanese original" PDF.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation in English “Indictment letter of indictment
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be exact, do it yourself.
● Original Japanese `` letter of indictment ''
`` Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese) ''
The English translation is incorrect. Please see the above "PDF" for English translation.
● See related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
2) Penal code
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
Part 2. I'm "appealing" two things.
`` Revised on November 4, 2019 ''
I am not only me, but also Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims of the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores "rule under the law",
it is natural to solve it by terrorism.
1. Foreigners engaged in "illegal work" other than "status of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law,
"Illegal labor crimes."
The Immigration Control Law, on the other hand,
punishes employees who are "causal" for illegal work
under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act (crime for promoting illegal employment).
However, Japanese justice has "punished" only foreigners, but not "employees."
This clearly violates Article 14 of the Japanese Constitution, the principle of equality under the law.
And it violates international law that prohibits "consciously" punishing only foreigners.
If an employer who hired a foreigner illegally is "innocent,"
a foreigner who has been illegally worked is also "innocent." .
2. The prosecutor "applied" Article 60 and Article 62
of the Penal Code "crimes to support other offenses" to Article 70
of the Immigration Act for the reason of "Support for Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".
Wrong with the law. "
“Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law” is the disposal of a person
who has obtained a status of residence by making a false application.
In the past, the Immigration Control Law did not punish anyone
who obtained a status of residence through a false application (former Articles 70 and 74-6).
The Amended Immigration Control Act was enacted in the 192th Extraordinary Diet,
which stipulated penalties for those who obtained a status of residence due to false applications,
those who assisted them,
workplaces, lawyers, administrative scriveners and school staff.
It has been enforced since January 1, 2017.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippines, a Philippine embassy official" is 100% "innocent."
"Reference": A foreigner has performed an act prescribed
in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law
(acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
But there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
Dispositions include "cancellation of status of residence"
and "forced deportation" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code" Sin to support other crimes "cannot be applied.
The "reason for crime" in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law pointed out
by the "indictment" has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law.
The public prosecutor has "smashed, crush something in one's hand" on the "bill of indictment."
However, "crush something in one's hand" by state power is "stop" of "statutory limitation,
statute of limitations".
The materials are below.
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
PS: White House replied to me that she was seriously considering a satisfactory solution to this problem.
I am waiting for the result. I hope that there is no lie.
If the URL of the web of the material is shown below, please email me. (Respond a private URL).
For uncertainties, please contact us!