To President Trump
2020-02-28: Dear Sir,
I think Carlos Ghosn is a victim of Nissan. How do you revive Nissan Auto? The British and French have a close relationship with Nissan. Carlos Ghosn is innocent. Nissan should resurrect with "the power of justice" without the help of prosecutors. President Macron, Prime Minister Boris Johnson! Help us rebuild Nissan.
Part 1. Read "Yoshio Tsukuda" 's "Negative History of the" Emperor Shioji "Problem Revived
by the Nissan Ghosn Case".
"Ichiro Shioji" is the former chairman of the Nissan Trade Union Federation.
He was called "Emperor Shioji" in Nissan's office and was "feared".
Nissan has not changed at all.
Nissan unions, no, "Japanese unions" should be up.
They should "have" justice.
Please read the following two articles.
The negative history of the "Emperor Shioji" problem revived by the Nissan Ghosn incident.
It is an introduction about Ichiro Shioji.
He lived a "huge private life" that was called "the labor aristocracy,"
but no one could complain to him.
The flashy private life of setting up a mansion in Shinagawa, riding a luxury car of Nissan,
owning a private yacht, and playing in a club in Ginza was said to be "Where is the source of money?"
However, even though he was referred to as "the labor aristocracy,"
he did not care, and he was rather "prideful."
Shun Ishihara, who became president in 1977,
formulated a management policy called "Global 10" with the goal of securing 10% of the world market,
and actively advanced overseas.
As part of this, Nissan planned to build a UK plant.
On the other hand, "Shioji" opposed "furious".
"Shioji" demanded a "stop" by saying, "If you forcibly build a British factory,
stop the Nissan production line!"
As a result, the relationship with the management team "went worse."
The “union leaders” used “power” as they wish.
The "leaders of the union" have seized human rights and control,
and have put Nissan's overall operations in a difficult situation.
This means that:
Nissan, even at that time,
There was a lack of corporate governance.
When Ishihara became president, I thought Nissan had changed.
But Nissan had not changed.
That's why Carlos Ghosn comes to Nissan.
"Carlos Ghosn" may have used Nissan, which lacked corporate governance.
No, Nissan executives and employees used Carlos Ghosn.
If you understand this, you will understand why "Carlos Ghosn's bad act" was possible.
New directors elected at the extraordinary shareholders' meeting should dispose of all parties involved
in the Carlos Ghosn case.
The “Nissan union” should also “remove” the “related union members”.
Many of the Japanese trade unions are affiliated with the CLOSE system,
so expulsing a union means retiring from Nissan Motor.
And everyone involved should be subject to "criminal punishment."
Prosecutors should acquit "Carlos Ghosn" if they do not want to dispose of those involved.
This is "equality under the law."
This is a corporate "organizational" crime.
It is an international shame to make only Carlos Ghosn a bad guy.
It will continue tomorrow.
Please see "bill of indictment" で at the "Site" below.
In this case, only by looking at this "bill of indictment",
you can understand the "error of applicable law".
Please see the "English translation" and "Japanese original" PDF.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation in English “Indictment letter of indictment
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be exact, do it yourself.
● Original Japanese `` letter of indictment ''
`` Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese) ''
The English translation is incorrect. Please see the above "PDF" for English translation.
● See related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
2) Penal code
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
Part 2. I'm "appealing" two things.
`` Revised on November 4, 2019 ''
I am not only me, but also Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims of the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to solve it by terrorism.
1. Foreigners engaged in "illegal work" other than "status of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law, "Illegal labor crimes."
The Immigration Control Law, on the other hand,
punishes employees who are "causal" for illegal work
under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act (crime for promoting illegal employment).
However, Japanese justice has "punished" only foreigners, but not "employees."
This clearly violates Article 14 of the Japanese Constitution, the principle of equality under the law.
And it violates international law that prohibits "consciously" punishing only foreigners.
If an employer who hired a foreigner illegally is "innocent,"
a foreigner who has been illegally worked is also "innocent." .
2. The prosecutor "applied" Article 60 and Article 62
of the Penal Code "crimes to support other offenses" to Article 70 of the Immigration Act
for the reason of "Support for Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act". Wrong with the law. "
“Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law” is the disposal of a person
who has obtained a status of residence by making a false application.
In the past, the Immigration Control Law did not punish anyone
who obtained a status of residence through a false application (former Articles 70 and 74-6).
The Amended Immigration Control Act was enacted in the 192th Extraordinary Diet,
which stipulated penalties for those who obtained a status of residence due to false applications,
those who assisted them, workplaces, lawyers, administrative scriveners and school staff.
It has been enforced since January 1, 2017.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippines, a Philippine embassy official" is 100% "innocent."
"Reference": A foreigner has performed an act prescribed
in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law
(acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
But there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
Dispositions include "cancellation of status of residence"
and "forced deportation" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code" Sin to support other crimes "cannot be applied.
The "reason for crime" in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law pointed out
by the "indictment" has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law.
The public prosecutor has "smashed, crush something in one's hand" on the "bill of indictment."
However, "crush something in one's hand" by state power is "stop"
of "statutory limitation, statute of limitations".
The materials are below.
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
PS: White House replied to me that she was seriously considering a satisfactory solution to this problem.
I am waiting for the result. I hope that there is no lie.
If the URL of the web of the material is shown below, please email me. (Respond a private URL).
For uncertainties, please contact us!