To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister
2020-03-13: Dear Sirs,
The Japanese government is "arrogance"! Carlos Ghosn is dangerous. President Macron should protect "Carlos Ghosn" in France. Deputy Justice Minister Justice met with Lebanon's President Aung on Tuesday. He appears to have "sought" Ghosn's "delivery." Peru's Attorney General charged Fujimori with murder, and in March 2003, an "interpol notice" was issued for "humanitarian crime" through the ICPO. The Japanese government continued to refuse delivery. The Abe administration is "arrogance"! Japan should "rule under the law."
Part 1. The Deputy Minister of Justice went to Lebanon
and agreed on the Ghosn incident with "cooperation between the two countries."
Nissan's former chairman, Carlos Ghosn,
fled to Lebanon, and the Justice Vice Minister of Justice met with Lebanon's President Aung on March 2.
He appears to have sought Ghosn's "delivery."
The full text is below.
https://www.fnn.jp/posts/00433136CX/202003030623_CX_CX
In September 2001, the Peruvian Attorney General indicted Fujimori for murder,
and in March 2003, issued an international interpol notice for humanitarian crimes through the ICPO.
It is alleged that he shot and killed a guerrilla
who had surrendered during the Japanese Embassy's Residence Case.
The Peruvian government frequently called on Japan to "deliver" for "other power abuses",
but the Japanese government continued to refuse delivery.
See Wikipedia for details.
I wrote yesterday why Carlos Ghosn was innocent.
The Japanese government is "arrogance".
When the former Peruvian President Fujimori fled to Japan,
the Japanese government continued to refuse Fujimori's "delivery",
despite having been "interpol noticed" for "humanitarian crime" through the ICPO Was.
I believe that only President Macron will not fall into the Japanese Honey Trap.
This is a battle between France and Japan over Nissan Motors.
French President Macron should protect Carlos Ghosn.
It will continue tomorrow.
Please see "bill of indictment" で at the "Site" below.
In this case, only by looking at this "bill of indictment",
you can understand the "error of applicable law".
Please see the "English translation" and "Japanese original" PDF.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation in English “Indictment letter of indictment
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be exact, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese `` letter of indictment ''
`` Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese) ''
The English translation is incorrect. Please see the above "PDF" for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● See related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Penal code
Penal Code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174
Part 2. I'm "appealing" two things.
`` Revised on November 4, 2019 ''
I am not only me, but also Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims of the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to solve it by terrorism.
1. Foreigners engaged in "illegal work" other than "status of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law, "Illegal labor crimes."
The Immigration Control Law, on the other hand,
punishes employees who are "causal" for illegal work under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act
(crime for promoting illegal employment).
However, Japanese justice has "punished" only foreigners, but not "employees."
This clearly violates Article 14 of the Japanese Constitution, the principle of equality under the law.
And it violates international law that prohibits "consciously" punishing only foreigners.
If an employer who hired a foreigner illegally is "innocent,"
a foreigner who has been illegally worked is also "innocent." .
2. The prosecutor "applied" Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code "crimes to support other offenses" to Article 70 of the Immigration Act
for the reason of "Support for Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".
Wrong with the law. "
“Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law” is the disposal of a person
who has obtained a status of residence by making a false application.
:::::
In the past, the Immigration Control Law did not punish anyone
who obtained a status of residence through a false application (former Articles 70 and 74-6).
The Amended Immigration Control Act was enacted in the 192th Extraordinary Diet,
which stipulated penalties for those who obtained a status of residence due to false applications,
those who assisted them, workplaces, lawyers, administrative scriveners and school staff.
It has been enforced since January 1, 2017.
:::::
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippines, a Philippine embassy official" is 100% "innocent."
"Reference": A foreigner has performed an act prescribed in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law
(acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
But there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
Dispositions include "cancellation of status of residence" and "forced deportation"
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code" Sin to support other crimes "cannot be applied.
The "reason for crime" in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law pointed out
by the "indictment" has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law.
The public prosecutor has "smashed, crush something in one's hand" on the "bill of indictment."
However, "crush something in one's hand" by state power is "stop" of "statutory limitation,
statute of limitations".
The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
PS: White House replied to me that she was seriously considering a satisfactory solution to this problem.
I am waiting for the result. I hope that there is no lie.
If the URL of the web of the material is shown below, please email me. (Respond a private URL).
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
Yasuhiro Nagano
It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/
Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister
2020-03-13: Dear Sirs,
The Japanese government is "arrogance"! Carlos Ghosn is dangerous. President Macron should protect "Carlos Ghosn" in France. Deputy Justice Minister Justice met with Lebanon's President Aung on Tuesday. He appears to have "sought" Ghosn's "delivery." Peru's Attorney General charged Fujimori with murder, and in March 2003, an "interpol notice" was issued for "humanitarian crime" through the ICPO. The Japanese government continued to refuse delivery. The Abe administration is "arrogance"! Japan should "rule under the law."
Part 1. The Deputy Minister of Justice went to Lebanon
and agreed on the Ghosn incident with "cooperation between the two countries."
Nissan's former chairman, Carlos Ghosn,
fled to Lebanon, and the Justice Vice Minister of Justice met with Lebanon's President Aung on March 2.
He appears to have sought Ghosn's "delivery."
The full text is below.
https://www.fnn.jp/posts/00433136CX/202003030623_CX_CX
In September 2001, the Peruvian Attorney General indicted Fujimori for murder,
and in March 2003, issued an international interpol notice for humanitarian crimes through the ICPO.
It is alleged that he shot and killed a guerrilla
who had surrendered during the Japanese Embassy's Residence Case.
The Peruvian government frequently called on Japan to "deliver" for "other power abuses",
but the Japanese government continued to refuse delivery.
See Wikipedia for details.
I wrote yesterday why Carlos Ghosn was innocent.
The Japanese government is "arrogance".
When the former Peruvian President Fujimori fled to Japan,
the Japanese government continued to refuse Fujimori's "delivery",
despite having been "interpol noticed" for "humanitarian crime" through the ICPO Was.
I believe that only President Macron will not fall into the Japanese Honey Trap.
This is a battle between France and Japan over Nissan Motors.
French President Macron should protect Carlos Ghosn.
It will continue tomorrow.
Please see "bill of indictment" で at the "Site" below.
In this case, only by looking at this "bill of indictment",
you can understand the "error of applicable law".
Please see the "English translation" and "Japanese original" PDF.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation in English “Indictment letter of indictment
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be exact, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese `` letter of indictment ''
`` Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese) ''
The English translation is incorrect. Please see the above "PDF" for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● See related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Penal code
Penal Code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174
Part 2. I'm "appealing" two things.
`` Revised on November 4, 2019 ''
I am not only me, but also Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims of the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to solve it by terrorism.
1. Foreigners engaged in "illegal work" other than "status of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law, "Illegal labor crimes."
The Immigration Control Law, on the other hand,
punishes employees who are "causal" for illegal work under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act
(crime for promoting illegal employment).
However, Japanese justice has "punished" only foreigners, but not "employees."
This clearly violates Article 14 of the Japanese Constitution, the principle of equality under the law.
And it violates international law that prohibits "consciously" punishing only foreigners.
If an employer who hired a foreigner illegally is "innocent,"
a foreigner who has been illegally worked is also "innocent." .
2. The prosecutor "applied" Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code "crimes to support other offenses" to Article 70 of the Immigration Act
for the reason of "Support for Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".
Wrong with the law. "
“Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law” is the disposal of a person
who has obtained a status of residence by making a false application.
:::::
In the past, the Immigration Control Law did not punish anyone
who obtained a status of residence through a false application (former Articles 70 and 74-6).
The Amended Immigration Control Act was enacted in the 192th Extraordinary Diet,
which stipulated penalties for those who obtained a status of residence due to false applications,
those who assisted them, workplaces, lawyers, administrative scriveners and school staff.
It has been enforced since January 1, 2017.
:::::
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippines, a Philippine embassy official" is 100% "innocent."
"Reference": A foreigner has performed an act prescribed in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law
(acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
But there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
Dispositions include "cancellation of status of residence" and "forced deportation"
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code" Sin to support other crimes "cannot be applied.
The "reason for crime" in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law pointed out
by the "indictment" has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law.
The public prosecutor has "smashed, crush something in one's hand" on the "bill of indictment."
However, "crush something in one's hand" by state power is "stop" of "statutory limitation,
statute of limitations".
The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
PS: White House replied to me that she was seriously considering a satisfactory solution to this problem.
I am waiting for the result. I hope that there is no lie.
If the URL of the web of the material is shown below, please email me. (Respond a private URL).
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
Yasuhiro Nagano
It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/
Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
