2020-05-27: Dear Sir,
In March last year, Secretary of State Pompeo pointed out that the human rights situation in China was deteriorating, and criticized China severely, saying "it is" outstanding "when it comes to human rights abuses."
The US House of Representatives plenary last December 3rd. The Chinese government has passed the Uighur human rights bill, which demands a strong response to the Trump administration, with overwhelming "407-1" approval, saying that the Chinese government is oppressing Muslims such as the Uighur ethnic minority in the Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region.
The United States should strictly criticize the Japanese government not only for China but also for "human rights violations in Japan." Americans are also "damaged".
Part 1. I email you every day.
The United States must strictly criticize the "human rights violations"
in the "Immigration Control Violations" by the "Government of Japan".
Only foreigners who have done "unqualified labor" will be punished,
but it is illegal under the Japanese constitution and international law because it is an arbitrary punishment.
It is illegal because the employer who hired them was not punished.
Therefore, foreigners who have performed “unqualified work” are not guilty.
And "I and the staff and diplomats of the Philippine Embassy"
who provided the "employment contract" to the "illegal workers" are not guilty.
The reasons for the crimes prosecutors describe in the "indictment" are:
We provided a false employment contract to "foreigners under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
(Acts outside the status of qualification)".
1) Then, foreigners could easily obtain the status of residence.
2) So they could live in Japan.
3) Since they were able to live in Japan,
foreigners were able to perform Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
(activities outside their qualifications).
4) Therefore, we, who provided the “fake employment contract”,
say that it is “criminal for supporting other crimes”
of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
(activities outside the status of immigration).
But this claim is illegal.
Suppose you provided a "false employment contract" to a foreigner.
And a foreigner attaches a "fake employment contract" and obtains "resident status".
in this case,
1) Foreign nationals who have obtained a status of residence are entitled to "revoke their status
of residence" under Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act.
This cancellation of the status of residence is an "administrative penalty"
by the Minister of Justice. And "forced deportation".
2) Therefore, it is not possible to apply the criminal law "criminal
in support of other crimes" to administrative sanctions.
I argue this many times, but the prosecution does not receive the "letter of complaint" or "bill of indictment".
But in 2017, the "facts about the amendment" of the Immigration Control Act proves it all.
Lawyers, judicial scriveners, etc.
who have provided "false employment contracts" to foreigners so that they can obtain a status
of residence will be criminally punished.
This is the reason for revision.
Even if a foreigner obtains "residence status" by "providing" a "document
of false employment contract", the "provider" cannot be punished.
Therefore, be able to punish by amending the law.
Clearly, we admit to us "the error in the applicable law".
The 2010 Immigration Control Violation Case was caused by the 2008 Lehman Shock.
Now, the new Corona is disrupting the economy more than the Lehman shock.
Also, many foreigners are illegally disposed of and exiled.
They come to Japan with a lot of debt.
Please "blame" the Japanese government to help them.
If you see this email, please "support" the "Prime Minister's Office".
The Japanese government should "recover the honor" and "compensate for the damage" to the victim.
There are many victims all over the world.
Of course, there are also American victims.
The act of making a weak person "arbitrarily" a "criminal"
and taking a "fine" is "human rights violation" itself.
Japan has the same culture as China.
Everything an "Asian power man" does is the same.
The “way” of economic activity is the same in Japan and China.
After the war, Japan had an economic war with the United States on textiles,
steel, automobiles, semiconductors, and so on.
Fortunately, the United States won, so Japan did not have to "war with arms" with the United States.
The United States should have “strong diplomacy” against “China”.
The United States should create a "state of freedom and democracy
that values human rights" through "power against the military".
It will continue tomorrow.
Please see "bill of indictment" on the "site" below.
Just looking at this "bill of indictment" in this case, you can understand the "error of applicable law".
Please see PDFs of "English translation" and "Original Japanese".
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● English translation “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano Kin Gungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, please do it yourself.
● Japanese original “letter of indictment”
`` Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese) ''
The English translation is incorrect. For English translation, see "PDF" above.
● See related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
2) Criminal law
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
Part 2. I "come" for two things.
`` Revised November 4, 2019 ''
I am not only me, not only Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims of the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to solve it by terrorism.
1. A foreigner has performed "illegal work" other than "resident status". But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act, "Crime of Illegal Labor."
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers
who have a "causal relationship" with illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "consciously".
(a crime that promotes illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but not "employed".
This clearly violates Article 14 of the Constitution of Japan, "the principle of equality under the law."
If the employer who illegally hired a foreigner is "innocent",
then the foreigner who was illegally worked is also "innocent". ..
2. The prosecution "applied" the "crime to support other crimes"
in Article 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law",
but "Applied" It's a legal mistake to do. "
“Immigration Law Article 22-4-4” is a disposition of a person
who has obtained a status of residence by a false application.
In the past, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties for persons
who obtained status of residence through false applications (former law Articles 70 and 74-6).
A revised Immigration Control Act was enacted
at the 192nd Extraordinary Diet session to target penal provisions for persons
who obtained residence status through false applications, employers who assisted them,
lawyers, administrative scriveners, and school staff.
It is "enforced from January 1, 2017".
"I, Kin Gungaku, diplomat of the Philippine country, staff of the Philippine Embassy" are 100% "innocent".
"Reference": A foreigner has performed the acts prescribed
in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act (acquisition of status of residence
by submitting false documents). However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence" and "compulsory deportation" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code," Crime in Supporting Other Crimes ", cannot be applied.
The “reasons of crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act,
which the “indictment” points out, have no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
The prosecution has "crushed, crush something in one's hand," "the complaint, bill of indictment."
However, "crush something in one's hand" by the state power is "stop" of "statutory, limitations of limitations".
The materials are below.
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
PS: The White House replied to me that he was seriously considering a solution that I was happy with.
I am waiting for the result I hope that there is no lie.
If the URL of the document's website is as shown below, please email us. (I will reply with a private URL).
Please contact us if you have any questions.