Japan's Justice in the Dark

Please support so that Japan will be governed under the law, fundamental human rights will be protected, and it will become a country complying with international law

The US will create a special zone on the US border with Mexico. France, on the other hand, will create a special zone in Algeria, their old friend, since they don't have any barren land like the desert. The "special zone in Algeria" is the same concept a

To President Trump!



2025-01-21: Weekday edition.
Le Pen of the National Rally (RN) should make concrete proposals for the "rebirth of France." First of all, Le Pen should create an "Algerian special zone" and "prevent the influx" of illegal immigrants.

The illegal immigration problem is a common problem in Europe and the United States. Each country understands that "immigrants" are necessary for economic activity. However, "many people" are opposed to "immigration." By creating a "special zone," Le Pen can "accept" 100% of the voice of the people.

"Illegal immigrants" who cannot understand French cannot become "workers." "Il-legal immigrants" who do not know French culture cannot "coexist" with French cit-izens. That is "obvious."

However, if France loses immigrants, it will lose low-wage workers like Germany, and many factories will have to relocate overseas. France's wages cannot compete with BRICS countries such as China.

The United States will create a special zone on the Mexican border within the Unit-ed States. In the case of France, since there is no "barren land" like a desert in France, they will create a "special zone" in Algeria, their "old friend".

The "special zone in Algeria" is the same "concept" as the "special zone on the Mexican border". I wrote about the "special zone on the Mexican border" this year as well, so please see "To The World media" on "Blogger".

France will cooperate with Algeria to create a "special zone" in Algeria. I think it should be operated in cooperation not only with France but also with "Germany, Italy, etc."

"Illegal immigrants" from Africa will be accepted into the "special zone in Algeria" with "temporary immigrant residence status" of "France, Germany, Italy, etc."

This will free "France, Germany, Italy, etc." from the "illegal immigrant" problem. I think that illegal immigrants currently living in each country will voluntarily move to the "special zone".

The reason is that although wages are low in the "special zone", food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are "free", so "life is richer than working in France".

If "temporary immigrants" learn "everyday conversation in French, etc., and French culture and lifestyle habits" in the "special zone", they will be granted "general work visas for France, etc."

Then, they can work freely in mainland France, and they are not illegal immigrants. I think they will be welcomed by the French people.

"Temporary immigrants" have "lower wages" than "Chinese workers". French com-panies, etc. will employ "temporary immigrants" at "low wages". This will eliminate the reason for them to lose out to "Chinese companies" in terms of wages.

The "factories" that remain in mainland France are factories of companies that make "high value-added products". In the case of the automobile industry, the "Al-gerian special zone" is where finished cars are made. The parts are made by com-panies in mainland France.

French workers operate robots to manufacture "engines, etc." "High-performance steel plates" are manufactured and shipped to the "Algerian Special Zone." In other words, it's a division of labor.

Part 1 Citations and References

The "common people" who are struggling to make ends meet and who are rebelling against immigrants are in uproar... Marine Le Pen's "National Rally" is creating a whirlwind in France today as well

https://www.newsweekjapan.jp/kimura/2024/03/post-250.php

I'll write again tomorrow.


Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."
NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp