To President Trump!
Weekday edition, May 12, 2025
The world is about to undergo dramatic changes due to the "Trump Tariffs". Many experts point out that Trump's "tariff policy" will reduce trade.
I believe that if the "provisional name: balanced countervailing duties" are added to this "Trump Tariff", the world economy will expand dramatically. Let me explain with the example of China.
Mr. Bessent laments that "China's business model relies on exporting cheap prod-ucts to the United States with government subsidies." There is no point in lament-ing.
He said that "it is important to get Chinese people to buy American products." That is correct. He should advise President Trump to adopt my proposal.
I believe that if Trump announces "balanced countervailing duties", the Chinese will "import American products" in order to "export Chinese products to the United States".
The purpose of Trump's "tariff policy" is to eliminate the "trade deficit". "Balanced countervailing duties" are the "centerpiece of the policy" to "get exporting coun-tries" to "import" American products.
The Chinese want to make a profit by selling Chinese products to America. They are angry that America is making exports difficult with tariffs. .
However, if they are told that there will be "zero tariffs" if they import American products, the Chinese will desperately "import American products" and export Chi-nese products.
The Chinese think, "Let's import American products in order to export Chinese prod-ucts." They are geniuses with unconventional ideas.
This is exactly what the Trump administration is aiming for, and the Trump admin-istration is "delighted." "Smart Chinese who want to make money" will take action immediately.
China is already a "rich country." Dollars are abundant. The Chinese will make a profit by importing American products and selling them to other Chinese.
And the Chinese will make even more profit by exporting Chinese products to Amer-ica. Tariffs are almost zero. Both the Chinese and the Americans are "delighted."
When China transitioned to a "market economy," the Chinese studied "economics" enthusiastically. The Chinese are a "genius group" when it comes to "making mon-ey."
In "economics", circulating money leads to "making money". There are many "smart people" in China. For them, "balanced countervailing duties" are "opportuni-ties".
"Balanced countervailing duties" are when the United States imposes "Trump tar-iffs" on the "net import amount" obtained by subtracting "export amount" from "im-port amount".
When "exporters to the United States" "import from the United States", "Trump tariffs" are imposed on the amount obtained by subtracting "import amount" from "export amount".
Companies exporting to the United States should "import US products" to make "Trump tariffs" "effectively zero" and take action to expand world trade.
Part 1 References
President Trump hints at new income tax cuts - US Treasury Secretary emphasizes progress in tariff negotiations
https://www.bloomberg.co.jp/news/articles/2025-04-27/SVDV2TDWX2PS00
I will write again tomorrow.
Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".
"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!
First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.
❤Click below to read the full article!
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.
In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.
However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.
As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".
As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.
Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.
In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".
In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) were also arrested.
The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".
<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.
"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)
The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".
If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).
Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.
The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:
1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."
2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).
3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."
4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."
5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."
6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."
This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."
This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.
The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."
My argument:
"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.
"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.
The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."
However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.
The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.
Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.
Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.
Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.
Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.
Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."
NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/
For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.
Thank you.
Yasuhiro Nagano
Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
