To President Trump!
September 2, 2025
Regarding the US-Russia summit, Bolton pointed out, "Trump didn't lose, but Putin clearly won." I believe Trump "won without fighting." The US completely avoided war.
If Biden had been president, there's no doubt that a nuclear war would have broken out between the US and Russia. The US has absolutely no need to go to war with Russia "for Ukraine."
If the US and Russia were to enter into a nuclear war, even if they won, it would be devastating for the US and its allies. China would undoubtedly become heg-emonic after the war.
Thanks to Trump's efforts, the Ukraine war has effectively come to a ceasefire. However, as long as Zelenskyy is president, Russia cannot let its guard down.
Zelenskyy embodies the proverb "take from Peter and give back to Paul." With-out Zelenskyy, things would "just work out."
Zelensky is a cunning man who is "free-riding" on the "money and military equipment" of the United States and Europe. The Zelensky Theater must "end."
Once the ceasefire in Ukraine is "on track," Trump must end the war in Palestine (Gaza).
Trump should work with Putin to urge Prime Minister Netanyahu to ceasefire. I believe he would comply if requested by two friendly superpowers.
Trump and Putin should recognize Palestine as a state, as Macron advocates. However, even then, the Gaza issue would not be resolved.
If "US-Russian troops" were stationed in Gaza as a UN force, Israel would be unable to attack Gaza. Hamas would also be unable to provoke Israel.
The problem is that even if US and Russian troops remain stationed in Gaza, rebuilding the city will be difficult. The top priority should be the lives of the Gazans. The UN can only provide support as refugees.
I have continued to propose that a "special zone" be established on the Philip-pine island of Mindanao, where Gazans who wish to do so could be accepted as "temporary immigrants."
I have proposed using the Philippine "special zone" as a base for British compa-nies' overseas factories, but why not try building it jointly between the United States and Russia?
Factory buildings would be built primarily by American and Russian companies in the "Mindanao Special Zone," and Gazans would work there as temporary immigrants.
Russia's economic development is hindered by a labor shortage. The United States is unable to employ low-wage workers, and as a result, it has a chronic "trade deficit" due to imports of Chinese products and other goods.
It would be a "surprise" if two superpowers, the United States and Russia, were to jointly operate a "factory complex" in the Philippines. Let's make it happen!
Part 1: References
"Trump Didn't Lose, But Putin Clearly Won" - Bolton's Analysis
https://www.cnn.co.jp/usa/35236732.html?dicbo=v2-tz5biqb
I'll write again tomorrow.
Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese)
Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".
"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!
First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.
❤Click below to read the full article!
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.
In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.
However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.
As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".
As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.
Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.
In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".
In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) were also arrested.
The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".
<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.
"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)
The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".
If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).
Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.
The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:
1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."
2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).
3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."
4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."
5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."
6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."
This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."
This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.
The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."
My argument:
"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.
"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.
The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."
However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.
The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.
Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.
Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.
Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.
Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.
Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."
NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/
For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.
Thank you.
Yasuhiro Nagano
Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
