To President Trump!
January 21, 2026
Last November, Senator Warner (Democrat) warned that the impact of rapidly developing artificial intelligence (AI) could lead to a 25% unemployment rate for new graduates within the next two to three years. Will President Trump issue an AI ban?
On November 17, Senator Warner pointed out that the economic frustration of many young people and families unable to find work despite paying high tuition fees for higher education could lead to "unprecedented levels of social unrest." I believe this is a bigger problem than the trade deficit.
"By #2028, this could become one of our most important challenges. We must prepare for this," he said. "A crisis is looming."
Congressman Warner is a former telecommunications executive and a powerful voice on technology policy, so people take his words seriously. I believe AI will be President Trump's "greatest enemy."
According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the unemployment rate for college graduates aged 20-24 was 9.3% as of August, up from 7.4% two years ago, and is expected to reach 25% within the next two to three years. This is a serious statistic.
Warner has proposed a large-scale job retraining program to address this sit-uation, arguing that major AI companies, which are impacting the economy, should cover 70-80% of the costs. I agree.
As AI becomes more widespread, labor unions have repeatedly called for rule-making to protect workers' rights and help them adapt to change. What exactly do you intend to do?
This month, Warner and Senator Hawley (R-Illinois) introduced legislation that would require companies and government agencies to report quarterly on the employment impact of the rise of AI. I believe concrete measures are urgently needed.
However, #Warner expressed the view that it's unlikely that Congress will pass a comprehensive bill on #AI safety. I think people are just confused and don't know what to do.
I think this is a problem common to all developed countries. It's not just a problem in the US, it's a problem all over the world. I think it will become a big problem once people in Europe become aware of it.
#AI will affect both #white-collar and #blue-collar workers, but I think it will have the biggest impact on #white-collar workers.
#AI is expected to have a #huge impact on #routine tasks, and will likely au-tomate or #replace many #tasks. I will propose my solution to this #seri-ousAIproblem tomorrow.
Part 1: References
AI Risks Leaving 25% of New College Graduates Jobless, Senator Says (Ex-cerpt)
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-11-17/ai-risks-leaving-25-of-new-college-grads-jobless-senator-says
I'll write again tomorrow.
Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese)
Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".
"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!
First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.
❤Click below to read the full article!
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.
In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.
However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.
As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".
As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.
Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.
In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".
In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) were also arrested.
The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".
<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.
"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)
The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".
If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).
Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.
The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:
1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."
2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).
3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."
4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."
5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."
6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."
This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."
This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.
The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."
My argument:
"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.
"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.
The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."
However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.
The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.
Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.
Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.
Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.
Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.
Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."
NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/
For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.
Thank you.
Yasuhiro Nagano
Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
