Japan's Justice in the Dark

Please support so that Japan will be governed under the law, fundamental human rights will be protected, and it will become a country complying with international law

Why is terrorism occurring in the e-mail to the president of Trump, signing countries? Could you please think together? Should Japan be a militarist country? . 2017-05-12

Why is terrorism occurring in the e-mail to the president of Trump, signing countries?
Could you please think together? Should Japan be a militarist country? . 2017-05-12

                                Yasuhiro Nagano

Dear Sirs, I am Japanese. I respect the great president.
Japanese citizens hate terrorist crimes. Please tell me, everyone in the signing country.
In order to prevent terrorist crime, Japan ratified the International Organized Crime Prevention Convention and, as a necessary national law, tried to establish a revision bill of "Organized Crime Punishment Act", "Prepare Crime Terror" (Conspiracy) is.
Under the Penal Code, in principle it is punishable for dangerous acts, even attempted or even preliminary punishment is an exception.
However, we are trying to punish acts far earlier than preparations as conspiracy.
Since the prewar Japan is militaristic, many citizens are worried because they have punished attempted and preliminary acts by the "security maintenance law". (The Public Security Law was abolished after the war.)
"Japan Federation of Bar Associations", "Asahi Shimbun" and "Tokyo Newspaper" are all denial-of-question discussions. I am the opposite.

In Japan, the religious organization 'Aum Shinrikyo' did terrorist acts such as scattering 'sarin' on the subway or snatching the police chief, but even before that, even the president of the police before that, "preparations for terrorism etc." I assure that terrorism can not be prevented even if a new establishment is made.

It is said that the International Organized Crime Prevention Treaty is concluded by 96% and 187 countries of the United Nations Member States and that only 11 countries including Japan have yet to conclude terrorism occurred in the signatory countries Why is it? Could you please think together? Should Japan be a militarist country?

I would like to file a complaint with the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights office against the illegal treatment received from the Japanese Government in 2010 "Individual Reporting System", but "Personal Reporting System" Because we have not ratified the system, we can not do it. I think it is better to ratify the "personal reporting system".
Documents to be submitted are below. http://www.miraico.jp/?????/
Please support a lawsuit against the International Criminal Court. I pray the president for happiness!
Best regards,

 

拝啓、私は日本人です。偉大な大統領を尊敬しています。
日本国民はテロ犯罪を憎んでいます。締結国の皆さん、教えてください。
日本はテロ犯罪を防ぐためとして、「国際組織犯罪防止条約」を批准し、必要な国内法として、「組織犯罪処罰法」の改正案「テロ等準備罪」(共謀罪)を、新設しようとしています。
刑法では、危険性がある行為を処罰するのが原則で、未遂や予備の処罰でさえ例外とされています。
ところが、予備よりもはるかに以前の段階の行為を共謀罪として処罰しようとしています。
戦前の日本は軍国主義ですから、「治安維持法」により未遂や予備行為を処罰してきましたので多くの国民が危惧しています。(治安維持法は戦後廃止されました。)
「日本弁護士連合会」、「朝日新聞」や「東京新聞」など全面否定の論陣です。私も反対です。

日本では、宗教団体の「オウム真理教」が「サリン」を地下鉄に散布したり、警察長官を狙撃するなどのテロ行為を行いましたが、その前警察長官でさえ、「テロ等準備罪」を新設しても、テロは防げないと断言します。

国際組織犯罪防止条約は、国連加盟国の96%、187か国が締結しており、未締結国は日本を含めて11か国のみであると言いますが、締結国でテロが発生しているのはなぜですか。一緒に考えていただけませんか?日本は、軍国主義の国にしたほうがいいですか?

 私は、2010年「入管法違反幇助事件」日本政府から受けた、不法な扱いに対して、国連の人権高等弁務官事務所に、「個人通報制度」で告訴したいのですが、「個人通報制度」の批准をしていないのでできません。「個人通報制度」の批准をするほうが先だと思います。
提出書類は下記にあります。http://www.miraico.jp/?????/ 
国際刑事裁判所への提訴を支援してください。大統領に、幸多かれと祈る!
敬具、