<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim!
To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister
2018-11-20: I am not in violation of the law.
So the police officer says, "You should admit your sin in general theory."
The prosecutor first declares "I am a great person."
And the prosecutor says, "If you recognize the crime,
I will make you a fine," "I will send you to jail if you do not admit the crime." That said,
he forces me to confess. The "intent" of "a man who thinks great" is above the law.
This is the idea of "Confucian nation".
Dear Sirs, I am Japanese. I am making two arguments.
Do not get confused.
Firstly, foreigners were criminalized for crimes of "labor that violated the status
of residence" of the Immigration Act (Article 70).
However, the employers hiring them are not disposed of as "a crime that supports illegal labor"
under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act.
This is an international law violation that discriminates only foreigners consciously.
Under "principle of equality under the law", they are not guilty.
The second is that I and the diplomats were punished for "crime of supporting other crimes"
under Article 62 of the Penal Code,
as supporting the acts of the "illegal labor of foreigners".
This is not guilty for two reasons.
A) If a foreigner is innocent under the first claim,
there is no one who supported "the crime of labor that violated the status
of residence" of (Immigration Law Article 70).
We are innocent.
B) The indictment was applied (Article 62 of the Criminal Code)
for reasons that supported "cancellation of status of residence by submitting false documents"
of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act.
However (Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Control Act) is "cancellation of status of residence"
and is not criminal penalty.
(This is a conscious violation of applicable law). We are innocent.
I think that it is Canada, but there is an interesting law in prostitution.
In Canada we arrest "the man who bought a woman".
However, a woman who is "prostitution" is "innocent".
Because "there is a man who buys a woman", "prostitution" is possible.
Indeed it is.
From "causality", I think that women want to earn "money" by doing "prostitution".
But without "a man who buys a woman", a woman can not "prostitute".
I think that it is "fact" that three people did "illegal labor" at a landscaping company.
However, the landscaping company that illegally employed foreigners has not been punished.
Nonetheless, only the Filipinos who did "illegal labor" are "sentenced to labor for one year".
(There are three years of "grace"). This is unjust.
This ruling violates the "Equality under the Law".
It is a breach of international law because it is intentional that only foreigners
who are weak people were made criminals without equally dispose of employers
who illegally employed foreigners.
It is "miserable story" that it was "complicit" even to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs
for the act of damaging the "international position".
The Constitution of Japan is "prescribed" by "Equality under the law".
International laws such as the UN Charter also prohibit "intentional disposal".
Prosecutors should not dispose of Filipinos who became "illegal workers"
if they do not punish the "landscaping company" who employed illegal employment.
China's "surprise" is "dirty relationship" between Japanese judicial and business operators.
The acts of Kanagawa Prefectural Police,
the National Police Agency,
the Prosecutor's Office, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs are as far as embarrassing.
Because they are professionals of the law, they are "arbitrary" criminal behavior.
I will continue on tomorrow.
I will continue until you understand.
This case is a violation of international law.
In each country "treaties ratified" take precedence over "laws of each country".
To "point out" a treaty violation is not "interference of domestic affairs".
The world should be ruled under the law.
The Japanese government is "crushing" complaints.
But "crush" by state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".
The material is below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
The Japanese government is not entitled to claim "abduction of Japanese" by North Korea.
The Japanese government should "resolve" the "abduction of foreigners
by the Japanese government" incident as "top priority issue".
This e - mail is sent to the prime minister 's official every day like everyone.
Sincerely yours,
Yasuhiro Nagano
It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/
Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
