Japan's Justice in the Dark

Please support so that Japan will be governed under the law, fundamental human rights will be protected, and it will become a country complying with international law

#MeToo Human rights victim! To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister 2018-01-08: Please help foreigners who were punished for "illegal labor" in Japan. Foreigners are innocent as they are in violation of international law. Help me.

<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim!


To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister


2018-01-08: Please help foreigners who were punished for "illegal labor" in Japan.
Foreigners are innocent as they are in violation of international law. Help me.

Dear sirs. A foreigner is innocent if he / she does not dispose of a person
who employed a foreigner of "illegal work"
under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act "a crime that promotes illegal employment".
In that case, it is the logic of law to not dispose of foreigners who have been illegally employed.
I am innocent.
Naturally, there is no one who "helped" any "illegal work".

In the incident that occurred in 2010,
police officials and prosecutors filed "more" malicious crimes.
We have not disposed of employers who previously made "illegal work"
under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act "Sins that promote illegal work".
However, only foreigners who carried out "illegal work" have been "fined"
for "illegal labor crime" under Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
And they were "forcibly repatriated" overseas.

In this case, he created "fake supporter" on behalf of "Employer" of Article 73-2 "Sin
that promoted illegal employment".
"Fake supporter" is one who supported Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Control Act.

By doing this, foreigners who did "illegal labor" were made "punishment
for labor" instead of "fines punishment".
And "Forcibly repatriated outside the country" did.

A third party is "me and" KinGungaku ", which provided" the documents
of employment contract "to Chinese.
This is the crime reasons the prosecutor points out in the "indictment".
The prosecutor says that the "employment contract document" is "false".
However, this is the provision of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act "Revoke the status
of residence by submitting false documents and obtaining status of residence".
As written, even facts are not criminal acts.
Therefore, even if it is as the prosecutor says, "KinGungaku" with me is innocent.

I will continue on tomorrow.
I will continue until you understand.

I "appeal" the two things.
Please support this year so that we can solve this year.

1. Foreigners conducted "illegal work" other than "qualification for residence".
But a foreigner is innocent.

Only foreigners were punished by Article 70 of the Immigration Act "Sins of illegal labor".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of illegal work with the Immigration Act 73-2
(a crime that promotes illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary "disposal" only foreigners, but they do not dispose of employers.
This obviously violates "principle of equality under the law"
And it violates international law prohibiting conscious disposal only of foreigners.

If an employer who illegally employed a foreigner is innocent,
a foreigner who has worked illegally is innocent.
If so, there is no one "who supported other crimes of criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippine country,
a staff member of the Philippine Embassy" is innocent.

2. The "reason for crime" to which the prosecution applies "Article 62 of the Criminal Code,
(crime of supporting other crimes)" is as follows.
Foreigners conducted the act prescribed in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act
(acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" against this.
Disposition is "cancellation of status of residence" by "Minister of Justice"
and "compulsory withdrawal to foreign countries".
Therefore, "Article 62 of the Penal Code, (crime of supporting other crimes)" can not be applied.

The Japanese government is "crushing" complaints.
But "crush" by state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The material is below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.
Please "salvage" a lot of "victims" with "courage and justice".
I request the Japanese government to "recover honor"
and "compensate for the victim" of the victim.

sincerely yours, Yasuhiro Nagano


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp