To President Trump
At the Japan-US Summit Meeting at the end of May and the G20 Osaka Summit in June,
I would like Prime Minister Abe to "direct" "complete solution" regarding "judicial administration
in violation of the Japanese Immigration Control Act".
I am seeking "restoration of honor" and "reparations of property lost due to illegal arrest
and detention."
Also, please "solve" the wishes of Mrs. Carroll Gone.
2019-05-15:Dear Sirs, There is a new framework called “Paris Agreement”
against global warming. America will withdraw.
Even if each country contributes $ 450 billion annually,
"Where will the money go?" A more effective way is
for countries to introduce "carbon duty" into "imported products".
I think that exporting countries will try to reduce “coal power generation”.
Part 1. President Trump in front of the White House
on June 1, 2017, criticized the $ 100 billion,
saying that "a big hit to the interests of the US economy, industry, workers,
people and taxpayers."
Also in 2015, the Secretary General of the Green Climate Fund has repeatedly stated
that the estimated fund will increase to require $ 450 billion annually from 2020 onwards.
But no one knows even where the money is "where to go".
The money actually contributed to the Global Warming Fund is used
for political purposes such as dictatorships and rulers
in developing countries such as the Caribbean, the Pacific,
the small islands of the Indian Ocean, and Africa.
It has become "acquisition funds" or "funds for bribery".
(Above, Wikipedia)
Germany will completely abolish coal-fired power generation,
which supplies nearly 40% of Germany's electricity by 2038,
and the United Kingdom will completely abolish coal fuel by 2025.
It turned out that there are factors other than "decarbonization"
behind the movement of "de-coal power generation" which spreads all over the world.
A study by ETH Zurich has revealed that coal-fired power plants are
becoming hot spots for diffusing harmful substances
into the atmosphere more than carbon emissions.
Coal-fired power plants emit not only CO2,
but also particulate matter, SO2, NOx and mercury,
which harm the health of many people around the world.
China and the United States are the two largest producers of coal power.
In terms of health damage, India has the highest "sacrifice" in the world.
Central Europe, North America and China have many modern power plants,
but Eastern Europe, Russia and India have many "old power plants"
that do not have enough exhaust gas treatment.
In Europe, emission control of power plants has been effective.
Local health damage caused by particulate matter,
SO2, and NOx mainly occurs in Asia (India and China) where coal-fired power is used.
As global coal resources are expected to last hundreds of years,
air pollution from harmful substances will also continue.
It is desirable not to mine coal with high mercury and sulfur content.
However, in the two major countries in growth (China and India),
industrialization continues and there is a high risk of worsening pollution.
The research team believes that reducing health hazards
from coal power should be a global priority.
Health damage from coal power generation will not be resolved by the Paris Agreement.
I think that it is more convincing than "decarbonization
for the prevention of suspicious global warming" if it becomes a measure
against health damage.
In order to prevent health damage caused by coal power generation,
I propose that "carbon duty" be applied to "imported products"
from countries that generate coal power.
As a result,
I believe that exporting countries will promote the abolition of “coal power generation”
with the economic disadvantage of “coal power generation”.
I think that the introduction of “carbon duty” should be discussed in G7 and G20.
If it takes time to conclude, France, Germany, etc. "precede"
and consider the introduction of "carbon duty".
Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.
1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).
However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".
If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.
2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.
Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.
The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".
The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
My information ***************************************************
Zip code
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
***************************************************
