To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister
2019-05-20:Dear Sirs, the Chinese government should rescue Chinese.
The first is a person who has violated Article 70 (4) of the Immigration Act in Japan.
And the second is a Chinese who has nothing to do with "illegal labor".
He was punishable under the "Criminal Code".
The name of the offense is Article 60 and Article 62 "sin of aiding" of the "Criminal Code"
against Article 70 (4) of the Immigration Act.
The Chinese government "wake up"!
Part 1. As described in the second part below, I "appeal" two things.
First, Chinese foreign students graduated from a Japanese university
and renewed their status of residence to join my company, Lefco.
The status of residence is "technology" or "interrogation international".
There was a Lehman shock in the fall of 2008.
So I canceled the Chinese hiring.
The four Chinese did not work for the status of residence, but each worked at a restaurant.
So they were arrested for violation of Article 70 (4) of the Immigration Act.
It is a fact that they have violated Section 70 (4) of the Immigration Act.
Article 70 (1) Any person falling under any of the following items shall be punished
with imprisonment with or without work for not more than 3 years
or a fine not excluded 3 million yen,
or shall be subject to the cumulative imposition of imporition with or without work and a fine.
(iv) A person who is clearly found to be engaged in a related
in activities related to management of business involving income or activities
for which he / she has received reward in violation of the provisions of Article 19, paragraph (1).
I saw "Report of interrogation" of "4 Chinese".
Three employers have not confirmed "Visa".
One person was a "forged visa".
The employer says. "I know it's a" forged visa "if you look closely."
None of the four Chinese employers have been arrested under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act.
Article 73-2 (1) Any person falling under any of the following items shall be punished
with imprisonment with work for not more than 3 years or a fine not excluding 3 million yen,
or shall be subject to the cumulative imposition of imporisonment and a fine.
(i) A person who has had an alien engage in illegal work in connection with business activities.
So I insist that only foreigners are "arbitrarily" "punished"
and therefore "violate international law".
If the prosecutor's office does not "punish" the employer
under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act at his discretion, the violator
of Article 70 (4) of the Immigration Control Act is also "innocent."
As you think that there is "objection" about this "view", please let us know your "opinion".
In the United States, 16 million "illegal immigrants" do "illegal labor".
In the United States, "illegal immigrants" are "illegal residents".
"Employers" who employ "foreigners who are not eligible to work"
under the American Immigration Control Act will be punished.
In the United States, "illegal immigration" works with "forged visas".
So "employers" say they did not know they were "foreigners who are not eligible to work".
The same is true in Japan.
In such a case, Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act does not apply to the “Modified Immigration Control Act”.
The American problem and the violation of Article 70 (4)
of Japan's Immigration Control Act are different levels.
One, Chinese have "regular stay visa".
They are not "illegal immigrants" who entered Japan illegally.
Even in Japan, if a foreigner whose visa is overdue (overstay) illegally works,
he will be forced to leave without punishment.
Unfortunately the Chinese had a "official visa".
The "illegal labor" and "illegal immigration" issues are not unique to Japan.
After understanding this, please consider the Chinese innocence.
I have repeatedly sent letters and emails to the Chinese government.
I'm also emailing Chinese media.
The Chinese people "are not only Faway's CFO!"
The Chinese government should help the poor!
Please check the immigration laws listed above (in English) below.
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4
Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.
1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor
with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).
However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".
If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.
2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.
Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" have no causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.
The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".
The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
PS:
The UK should leave the EU unconditionally, respect the referendum and show the example of the democratic nation to the world.
Since many foreigners have been sacrificed in the Immigration Control Violation Case, please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."
It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/
Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
