To President Trump
2019-09-12: Dear Sir,
There are many victims of violations of immigration laws of the Japanese government
in the United States.
Japan has ratified human rights treaties.
The United States should require the Japanese government to “recover honor”
and “compensation” for the American people.
The Japanese government should observe international treaties.
It's crazy to “bullying” illegal migrants in Latin America
and not defending Americans.
Part 1. This case does not “punish” “employers” who hired foreigners illegally,
but punish only foreigners who “work illegally”.
The Philippine who worked illegally is not the same as the “illegal immigrants”
in the United States.
They are foreigners who have lived in Japan with a "visa status"
according to the Immigration Control Act.
Even Americans are not “illegal immigrants”.
Americans have officially entered the country after receiving a visa status.
Many of them have violated Article 70 of the Immigration Law due to “labor other
than visa status”.
Under the rules of the human rights treaty, “punishment” should be equal.
It is against international law to punish only foreigners “specially”.
Japan's “immigration law” is also “legislation”
in line with international law.
Foreigners who do work other than visa status will be punished
under the Immigration Act Article 70.
Unlawful labor cannot be “established” by foreigners alone.
Employers are punished
by Immigration Law Article 73-2 “Sins that promote illegal employment”.
In order to strictly apply Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act,
Japan has introduced a “Resident Status Card” system in addition to a “Passport”.
If a foreigner forges a "passport" or "visa status" and submits it to the employer,
the employer will not be punished.
But they all had a legitimate “visa status”.
Employers cannot make an “excuse”
that they did not know Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
The “special civil servant” abused the fact that the general public
and Filipinos do not know the law, and “created” a “supporter”
in place of the Immigration Act Article 73-2 “Sin to Promote Unlawful Employment”.
“Special civil servants” punished “supporters”
for “reasons” that “supported” the immigration law 22-4- (4) “cancellation
of visa status”.
The “special civil servant” made the supporter of Article 22-4- (4),
“Disposition by filing of false documents,” a sinner.
They punished by "changing their sin name".
Philippine diplomats
who supported Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act were made supporters
of Article 70 “Unqualified Activities” of the Immigration Act.
Did you understand this meaning?
The US government should claim “recovery of honor”
and “compensation” for Americans insisting on violations of international law
by the Japanese government.
I e-mail the White House every day and explain.
My doubts. Why does the White House not protect the human rights of Americans?
It must have fallen into the “honey trap” of the Japanese government.
President Donald Trump is rich.
Is the presidential honey trap letting the Abe administration buy missiles
and military aircraft?
Americans should give an answer in next year's presidential election.
It will continue tomorrow.
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery
and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished
for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor
under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing"
only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes
of the Penal Code” against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.
2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds of “support
of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.
A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship
with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.
The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.
The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
Yasuhiro Nagano
My information ********
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
********
