To President Trump
2019-09-30: Dear Sir,
Philippine embassy officials and diplomats do not violate Japanese law “even 1 mm”.
Three Filipinos are victims of “landscaping companies” who hired them illegally.
If “Landscaping Companies” “Compliance” Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act,
they did not violate Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
Criminals are police officers and prosecutors.
Part 1. On the surface, Filipinos
who have done "unlawful illegal work" are regarded as criminals
under the Immigration Act Article 70 "Illegal Labor Offenses".
“Illegal labor” cannot be done by foreigners alone.
The Immigration Act punishes employers
who illegally hired foreigners under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act.
However, it does not punish "supporters"
who are illegal employers as described in Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
the supporter of the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4 “Submitting false documents
and obtaining status of residence” is disguised as a supporter
of the Immigration Act Article 70.
There is a problem here.
In “bill of indictment”, the “act” that “supported” Article 22-4-4
of the Immigration Control Act is set as “reason for crime”.
Moreover, it is considered "crime" because it "supported" Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act.
This is not "bill of indictment".
This is a “replacement” of criminal facts.
The act supported was the act of "providing" the "false document" described
in the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4.
False documents are “documents of employment contracts whose contents are false”.
About "act" that "supported" Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law,
There is no “administrative disposition” before July 1, 2010.
The following “Administrative Disposition” is the same as “principal offense”
in the revision of the Immigration Law on July 1, 2010.
1) Cancellation of status of residence.
2) “Forced return”.
Therefore, Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code,
“Sin to Support Other Crimes” are not applicable.
The disposal is the “administrative disposal” mentioned above.
Therefore, Philippine embassy officials and diplomats are “false accusation”.
They do not violate Japanese law “even 1 mm”.
None of the three Filipinos have even received a “cancellation
of status of residence” from the Minister of Justice
for violating the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4.
The three Filipinos are “not guilty” in order to comply with the immigration law,
equality under the law, and international law.
Employers who hired three Filipinos illegally are not punished by the Immigration Act.
If that is the case, the three Filipinos who illegally "work out
of qualification" are also "not guilty".
There is no excuse that the employer did not know "Immigration Act Article 73-2"
in the July 2010 Immigration Act Amendment.
If the employers were observing Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act,
three Filipinos would not have violated Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
Three Filipinos are "victims".
The Japanese government should apologize to them.
Arresting and imprisoning is not just negligence,
but a malicious and deliberate criminal act that squeezes the freedom
of decision-making by illegal means only for Filipinos.
Therefore, the act of defendant accused falls under Article 194 “abuse of authority
by special public officer”.
Is the Philippine government still not protesting the Japanese government?
It is the duty of the Philippine government to protect the Philippine people.
If the Philippine government doesn't understand, you should ask me questions.
It will continue tomorrow.
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English text “Indictment letter of indictm
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
2) Criminal law
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.
2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 o
f the Immigration Control Act on the grounds of “support
of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.
A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence”
and “forced relocation” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.
The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.
The materials are below.
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!