To President Trump
2019-09-25: Dear Sir,
We are giving illegal punishment for violation of the Immigration Control Act.
This is a human rights issue.
Prosecutors make Chinese and Philippine people who come to work in Japan “idiots”,
and diplomats in the Philippines are also “idiots”.
He tells foreigners not to make a “bossy face” without knowing the law
or knowing international law.
The United States cannot say anything to Japan. “Justice Staff” leaves the White House.
Part 1. “Criminal facts” of the prosecutor's “abuse of authority
by special public officer”.
Around June 2014, Filipinos worked in a “landscaping company”
in Tokyo for non-qualified activities.
“Prosecutors” did not arrest employers who hired them illegally
for “special feeling” in Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act,
“Sins to Promote Unlawful Employment”.
They decided to make the poor Philippine staff “criminals”.
“Prosecutors” hated “poor people coming to Japan” even in the case of Chinese.
“Prosecutors” hate the “poor people who come to Japan” even in the case of Filipinos.
When a “poor country citizen” comes to Japan, it will “crime”.
That is why the Chinese and Philippines were targeted.
I think the victims are in more countries.
I think they are the same idea as President Trump because they are “high-ranking bureaucrat”.
In Japan, those who go against the prosecution are “criminals”.
So even the Diet member does not go against the prosecution.
Only “Prosecutors” can be “indicted in court”.
Even the prime minister can be arrested and made a criminal.
So the prosecutor copied "2010 Case Handling".
That is “Chinese Immigration Law Article 70 violation”.
And “Indictment” that “provided false documents” to Chinese
who “violated Article 22-4- (4) of Immigration Law”.
They came up with the idea to `` exile Japan's Philippine embassy officials and diplomats!
Instead of a landscaping company that violated Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act,
the Philippines embassy officials and diplomats were made criminals.
In response to “violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act”,
the “supporter of Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Control Act” was “punished”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code.
Again, the violation of Article 22-4- (4)
of the Immigration Act is an administrative measure of the Minister of Justice.
1) Cancellation of status of residence.
2) Forced to leave the country.
Due to the revision of the Immigration Act in 2010, the “supporters”
in Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act are also disposed of
in the same way as “principal offense”.
Philippine embassy officials and diplomats simply "provided" false documents to the Filipinos.
This is not a crime. This is "administrative disposal".
It will continue tomorrow.
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.
2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds of “support
of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.
A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.
The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.
The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
Yasuhiro Nagano
My information
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
