To President Trump
2019-10-17: Dear Sir,
Police officers cannot explain the facts of the crime through interrogation. So the police say, “You should admit the sin in general”. And a few days before the indictment. The police officer says, “You will be prosecuted. The reason is because of“ Misesime ”(public flogging). “This was decided at the meeting,” he said. This is the fact of “judicial law” in Japan.
Part 1. The prosecutor's criminal motive was inspired by the revision of the Immigration Act,
which will be implemented in July 2010.
Foreigners who supported “violating acts”
in the Immigration Act Article 22-4 “Cancellation of Status of Residence”,
as well as “violators”, were “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced removal”.
This is “administrative disposition”,
but it was created for the reason of the crime
of supporting Article 70 “Illegal Labor” of the Immigration Control Act.
Immigration law is mainly a law that stipulates “treatment” for foreigners.
Therefore, many do not know the contents of the law.
So they used this “ignorance”.
Violations of Article 70 of the Immigration Act occur on a daily basis.
In June 2010, when I was arrested and detained by the police “detention centre”,
the “detention center” was overflowing with foreigners.
The “detention center” of any police station was full of foreigners.
The court was also full of foreigners.
In cases that violate Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act,
employers will not be disposed of under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
So foreigners become “criminals” for a small “fine”.
Even a small “fine” is a “criminal punishment”.
Foreigners who commit crimes are automatically forced to leave.
Interestingly, if an "illegal resident" does "illegal labor",
it will be "innocent" and "forced removal".
The reason for this is that “legitimate residents” cannot be “forced removal”
unless they are “criminals”.
President Trump will be surprised if he understands this meaning.
"I'm not a bad guy like the Japanese government!"
However, in this case, foreigners are discriminated against.
They consciously consider making foreigners “work punishment”
for violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
If only foreigners are set to "work punishment",
it will attract public attention.
So they “devised” to “punish” the “violators”
and “supporters” of the Immigration Act Article 70 equally.
This is what the past prosecutors could not do.
It was impossible to do because it was impossible with "logic of law".
That's why a young prosecutor planned a crime to get an “excellent track record”.
But without organizational support it is impossible to do.
Prosecution will be decided at the Prosecution Meeting.
In other words, the crime was approved at the meeting.
Because the police are under the control of the prosecutor, they do not make sense.
(The police officer was “worried”).
Even if the prosecution prosecutes, the judge should “dismiss”
for violating applicable law.
However, the judge also “participated” in the “prosecution crime”.
It will continue tomorrow.
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.
But crazy.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand,
the Immigration Control Law punishes employers who are “causal”
of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.
2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds
of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.
A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence”
and “forced relocation” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.
The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.
The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
Yasuhiro Nagano
My information
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
