To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister
To President Trump
2019-11-18: Dear Sir,
Japan's political parties, along with the ruling and opposition parties, have become only “national socialist” political parties during the war. No longer defends the “law” legislated by the Diet. “Tolerate” the “judicial administration” that “ignored” even the laws and precedents they enacted. Japan needs to “build” a democratic system once again under the Allied Forces.
Part 1. “Many foreigners” have become “victims” of “Japanese judicial crimes”
in the “Immigration Law Violation Case”.
They are punished by “fines” or “punishment of labor”
under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act for work other than their status of residence.
And they are “forced repatriation”.
However, the “employer” who “directly hires foreigners”,
which is a direct “causal relationship”, has not been “punished”
under Article 72-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
This violates Article 14 “Equality under the Law” of the Japanese Constitution.
Discriminating foreigners “consciously” also violates “international law”.
If "employers" are "innocent", foreigners illegally "employed" by them are also "innocent".
The prosecution carried out "extremely illegal punishment" by using the fact that "Japanese"
and "foreigners" were "ignorant of Japanese law".
A “third party” who has nothing to do with “violation of Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act” provided “false documents” to foreigners.
Foreigners attached a “false document” and obtained a “resident status”.
The foreigner then conducted Article 70 “Unqualified Labor” of the Immigration Control Act.
The prosecution punished the “third party” under “Articles 60 and 62
of the Penal Code” for providing “false documents”.
This is not a causal relationship that “supported” Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
Providing “false documents” is not a crime.
This is clearly stated in the January 2017 revision of the Immigration Control Act.
Because it was not a crime, it was legislated to make it a crime.
Foreigners' "false documents" and "acts of obtaining status
of residence" are stipulated in the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4.
The disposal is “Residence of residence status” and “Forced removal”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the person who provided the “false document” is “innocent”
under Article 31 of the Constitution.
However, as a result of the July 2010 amendment to the Immigration Control Act,
foreigners who provided “false documents” were “revoked”
and “forced repatriation” of their “residence status” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, “Kingungaku who is Chinese” and “I” who were arrested in 2010 are “innocent.
In addition, 2014 and 2015 Philippine embassy officials and diplomats are "innocent".
When I say the "theory of law" above, the prosecution says "your logic".
However, the Ministry of Justice has determined that the act
of providing “false documents” to foreigners is “innocent”.
Since "evidence" cannot be "punished", a law to "punish" was "enacted" in January 2017.
Political parties and legislators should check the minutes of the Diet.
And there is a “judgment example” in which tax accountants were punished by this law.
I email this to the Diet and political parties every day.
However, it is still “ignored”.
In this state, Japanese citizens and foreigners visiting Japan cannot live with peace of mind.
Japanese citizens should demand the resignation
of the opposition party "members" as well as the "ruling party" members.
They are still “silent”.
It will continue tomorrow.
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
`` Revised November 4, 2019 ''
I'm not only Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims in the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to Article 14 “Principles of Equality under the Law”
of the Japanese Constitution.
It violates international law that prohibits "consciously" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent". .
2. The prosecution applied “applying” the crimes supporting other crimes
in Article 60 and 62 of the Penal Code
against Article 70 of the Immigration Act on the grounds of “support
of the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4”.
Is an error in the law.
"Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law" is the disposal of those
who have obtained the status of residence through fake application.
:::::
Previously, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties
for those who obtained status of residence through false applications (Article 70, Article 74-6).
The Amended Immigration Act was enacted at the 192nd Special Diet session
for those who have obtained a status of residence through false application,
and who have been assisted with such work, lawyers, administrative scriveners, and school staff.
“Effective from January 1, 2017”.
:::::
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat and Philippine embassy employee" is 100% "innocent".
“Reference”: Foreigners acted in accordance with Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents). However,
there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence”
and “forced relocation” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The prosecutor is "crush something in one's hand".
However, “crush something in one's hand” by the state power is “stop”
of “aging, statistics of limitations”.
The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue. I am waiting for the result I hope that there is no lie.
Yasuhiro Nagano
It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/
Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
