To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister
2019-12-16: Dear Sir,
There was a question from a reporter from an overseas media. I think this problem is not solved in Japan because “Abe administration” and “opposition party” are doing “back deal”. The Japanese non-partisan group is not expecting the Abe administration or the opposition party. International media, please report the “Abe political scandal” that will shake Japan. It is to protect "freedom and democracy".
Part 1.Japanese newspaper media is the advertising tower of the Abe administration.
In order to earn advertising revenue, you cannot report “disadvantageous to the Abe administration”.
The international NGO “Reporters Without Borders” has also given a rating
of “There is a problem” in the “5-level evaluation”.
I will quote from the following site.
On April 26, 2017, an international NGO, “Reporters Without Borders”,
headquartered in Paris, announced the latest freedom rankings for the press.
(The material is old.)
Japan dropped 11 ranks from 2016 to 72nd, ranking the lowest among the seven major countries (G7).
Nordic countries occupy the “upper”,
and the majority of dictatorships such as Syria and North Korea are “lower”.
Japan was ranked 11th in 2010, but the (second) Abe administration has been declining year after year.
In the five-step evaluation, I was stamped with a “country with problems”.
It is for this reason that I am suffering.
In 2017, the Nordic countries such as No. 1 Norway, No. 2 Sweden,
No. 3 Finland and No. 4 Denmark monopolized the “high ranking” in the “Press Freedom Ranking”.
In East Asia, Taiwan ranked 45th, South Korea 63rd, Japan 72nd,
Hong Kong 73rd, China 176th, and the world's lowest North Korea.
With this, it is impossible to expect the “correct report” from the Japanese media.
Japan is a country that is vulnerable to external pressure.
Please “point out” this problem from the international community.
The “Cherry Blossom Viewing Party” hosted
by Prime Minister Abe was used as the “Advertising Tower” of “Japan Life”,
which is famous for its MLM.
The “opposition party” will make this issue “unresolved” as usual.
The Japanese people will move further away from the opposition party.
As a result, the Abe administration will continue to have an increasingly “dictatorship”.
World journalists should protect Japan's “freedom and democracy”.
This week, we will introduce articles from
(Weekly Bunharu Digital Editorial Department / Weekly Bunharu Digital).
Please do your own interview with this article as a hint.
https://news.livedoor.com/article/detail/17491879/
It will continue tomorrow.
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
`` Revised November 4, 2019 ''
I'm not only Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims in the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law Article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(the crime that promotes illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” only foreigners,
but did not “punish” “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to Article 14 “Principles of Equality under the Law”
of the Japanese Constitution.
It violates international law that prohibits "consciously" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent". .
2. The prosecution “applied” the crimes supporting other crimes
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the grounds of “supporting the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4” Is an error in the law.
"Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law" is the disposal of those
who have obtained status of residence through false application.
:::::
Previously, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties
for those who obtained status of residence through false applications (Article 70, Article 74-6).
The Amended Immigration Act was enacted at the 192nd Special Diet session
for those who obtained status of residence through falsification applications,
office workers who helped them, lawyers, administrative scriveners, and school staff.
“Effective from January 1, 2017”.
:::::
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat and Philippine embassy employee" is 100% "innocent".
“Reference”: Foreigners acted in accordance with Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The prosecutor is "crush something in one's hand".
However, “crush something in one's hand”
by the state power is “stop” of “aging, statistics of limitations”.
The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me on this issue. I am waiting for the result I hope that there is no lie.
Please e-mail if the URL of the document web is as shown below. (Return a private URL).
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
Yasuhiro Nagano
It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/
Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
★障がい者がつくったお弁当を買ってあげてください! お電話してあげてください。紹介してください。
http://tomonisango.blog.jp/archives/cat_306084.html
★「他人の不幸は蜜の味」「愛は世界の民を救う」 詳しくは、
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
