To President Trump
2019-12-17: Dear Sir,
It was around the time when “Meeting to see cherry blossoms” became a problem. The reporter questioned "NIkai Secretary General" of the "Liberal Democratic Party". “The secretary general of the Liberal Democratic Party” said “What's wrong?” The reporter was unable to answer the question. The reporter would not have known the law. The reporter would have been scared. In Japan, there are no journalists like the reporters of “CNN” or “New York Times”.
Part 1. This week, we will introduce articles from
(Weekly Bunharu Digital Editorial Department / Weekly Bunharu Digital).
Please do your own interview with this article as a hint.
https://news.livedoor.com/article/detail/17491879/
“This is the“ honeymoon relationship ”of more than 40 years
between the famous“ Japan Life ”of MLM and politicians.
This is the reality of Japanese politics.
Of course, as for the newspaper media, “Japan Life” is “advertising good customer”.
I did not write an article that condemns the "bad business law."
Making an article about this unscrupulous commercial law means "turning the politician
of the administration to the enemy".
An outline is given first.
“Bunharu” reported on “Japan Life, Inc.” in the whirlpool of the problem of “Sakura viewing”.
The “suspicion” that “invitation invitation” was sent to “former chairman
of the company” in “Invitation frame of Prime Minister Abe” “surfaced”.
The "former president" has been making "political donations"
for over 40 years to create "honeymoon relationships" with politicians.
Common sense of "Problem of seeing cherry blossoms".
It has been more than 40 years of “corrupted relationships”
between “a famous person of MLM, former chairman of“ Japan Life ”” and “politicians”.
Since December 9 is the end of the Diet session,
the opposition party is calling for a significant extension of the session.
Of course, the purpose is to pursue the “problem around the“ Cherry Blossom Viewing Party ””
that is “flaming up”.
Among the “invitation list problems” that the government conceals,
one of the notable issues is as follows.
It is a “suspicion” that an invitation was sent to “Yamaguchi” (77),
the former chairman of “Japan Life”, famous for “Multi Commercial Code”
in “Invitation frame of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe”.
It was spring 2015 that the “Yamaguchi” former chairman received an “Invitation
for the“ Cherry Blossom Viewing Party ””.
Former Chairman Yamaguchi pasted a copy of the invitation on the “Advertising Flyer”
and “Used” it for “Advertising”.
“Invitation” of “Meeting Cherry Blossoms” was received
from “Prime Minister Shinzo Abe” to “Chairman Yamaguchi”.
The “opposition party anti-administration party” claims
that it was an “Abe frame” invitation based on internal data
from the Cabinet Office, but Prime Minister Abe denied.
But this lie is broken.
It will continue tomorrow.
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
`` Revised November 4, 2019 ''
I'm not only Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims in the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law Article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers who are “causal”
of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(the crime that promotes illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” only foreigners, but did not “punish” “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to Article 14 “Principles of Equality under the Law”
of the Japanese Constitution.
It violates international law that prohibits "consciously" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent". .
2. The prosecution “applied” the crimes supporting other crimes
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the grounds of “supporting the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4” Is an error in the law.
"Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law" is the disposal of those who have obtained status
of residence through false application.
:::::
Previously, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties for those
who obtained status of residence through false applications (Article 70, Article 74-6).
The Amended Immigration Act was enacted at the 192nd Special Diet session for those
who obtained status of residence through falsification applications, office workers
who helped them, lawyers, administrative scriveners, and school staff.
“Effective from January 1, 2017”.
:::::
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat and Philippine embassy employee" is 100% "innocent".
“Reference”: Foreigners acted in accordance with Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The prosecutor is "crush something in one's hand".
However, “crush something in one's hand” by the state power is “stop”
of “aging, statistics of limitations”.
The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me on this issue.
I am waiting for the result I hope that there is no lie.
Please e-mail if the URL of the document web is as shown below. (Return a private URL).
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
Yasuhiro Nagano
My information
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
