To President Trump
2020-01-16: Dear Sir,
Last fall, Carlos Ghosn's lawyer, Hironaka, published a statement he had filed with the court.
"The case was designed by prosecutors and Nissan,
and was a national investigation into not giving Nissan to France," he said.
The BBC sought comment from Nissan but was rejected.
It is obvious that the Japanese government would lose his trust in the "Carlos Ghosn" trial,
so it is "reasonable" to consider him "missed".
Part 1. It is BBC news on October 25, 2019.
https://www.bbc.com/japanese/50177958
Ghosn's lawyer demands abandonment of "prosecution" "Judicial dealings are illegal."
The lawyer of Carlos Ghosn, 65, a former chairman of Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.,
who has been charged with violating the Companies Act,
held a press conference in Tokyo on the 24th,
saying that the judicial transaction between Nissan executives
and prosecutors was "illegal" He has filed a letter
with the Tokyo District Court seeking dismissal of the indictment.
Former Chairman Ghosn, a Brazilian automaker who was a "big guy"
in the auto industry on November 19, had "grave misconduct,"
including "understatement of executive compensation" and "misappropriation of company funds.
" He was "arrested" for allegedly "violating the Financial Instruments and Exchange Law."
Ghosn has consistently asserted innocence.
Currently on bail, a trial is expected to begin next spring.
Attorney Hironaka of the lawyer released the document submitted to the court on April 24.
"The incident was designed by prosecutors and Nissan,
and was a national policy investigation to prevent Nissan from passing to France," he said.
In addition, Nissan executives have made a "judicial transaction"
with the "purpose" of causing Ghosn to "loss of position" to prevent integration with "Renault."
"It is illegal, contrary to the original" purpose of the system. "
The BBC sought comment from Nissan but was rejected.
Many experts and media in the United States pointed out
that the "Carlos Ghosn" problem was a private company internal problem.
Hironaka is a competent lawyer.
"The focus of the trial" has been narrowed down to "the investigation of national policy."
He regards "using" the Tokyo District Public Prosecutor's Special Investigation Division
as a "problem" despite the fact that the Japanese government is an internal problem
for private companies.
I was very interested.
Will the Japanese justice system "99.9%" win,
or will the international community's "common sense of law" win?
Japanese common sense is "unreasonable".
Therefore, it is vulnerable to "external pressure" from the international community.
Continue tomorrow.
Please see "bill of indictment" で at the "Site" below.
In this case, only by seeing this "bill of indictment",
you can understand the "error of applicable law".
Please see the "English translation" and "Japanese original" PDF.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation in English “Indictment letter letter of indictment
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be exact, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese Indictment letter of indictment
`` Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese) ''
The English translation is incorrect. Please see the above "PDF" for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see the relevant laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Penal code
Penal Code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174
Part 2. I'm "appealing" for two things.
`` Revised on November 4, 2019 ''
I am not only me, but also Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims of the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to solve it by terrorism.
1. Foreigners engaged in "illegal work" other than "status of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law "Illegal labor crimes."
On the other hand, the Immigration Law punishes employees who are "causal"
for illegal work under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Law (crimes for promoting illegal employment).
However, Japanese justice has "punished" only foreigners,
but not "employees."
This clearly violates Article 14 of the Japanese Constitution,
the principle of equality under the law.
And it violates international law that prohibits "consciously" punishing only foreigners.
If the employer who hired a foreigner illegally is "innocent,"
the foreigner who was illegally worked is also "innocent." .
2. The prosecutor has "applied" Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code "crimes to support other crimes" to Article 70
of the Immigration Law for the reason of "Support
of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Law" Wrong with the law you do. "
"Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law" is the disposition of a person
who has obtained a status of residence by false application.
:::::
In the past, the Immigration Law did not punish anyone
who obtained a status of residence through a false application (former Articles 70 and 74-6).
The Amended Immigration Control Act was enacted in the 192nd Extraordinary Diet,
which stipulated penalties for those who obtained status
of residence due to false applications, their employers who assisted them,
their workplaces, lawyers, administrative scriveners and school staff.
It has been enforced since January 1, 2017.
:::::
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippines,
a Philippine embassy official" is 100% "innocent."
“Reference”: A foreigner has performed an act prescribed
in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law (acquisition of status of residence
by submitting false documents). However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
Dispositions include "cancellation of status of residence" and "forced deportation"
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code" Sin to support other crimes "cannot be applied.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act pointed out
by the “Indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law.
The public prosecutor has "squeezed, crush something in one's hand" of the "bill of indictment."
However, "crush something in one's hand" by the state power is "stop"
of "statue of statute of limitations".
The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
PS: White House replied to me that she was seriously considering a satisfactory solution to this problem.
I am waiting for the result. I hope that there is no lie.
If the URL of the web of the material is shown below,
please email me. (Respond a private URL).
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
Yasuhiro Nagano
My information
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
