To President Trump
2020-01-30: Dear Sir,
All we need is a "business warrior" in Japan. Prime Minister Abe said in Article 9 of the Constitution that "specify the existence of the SDF". Many Japanese believe that doing so will "war." Under Abe's "Revised Constitution," the SDF cannot prevent South Korea from invading Takeshima. The necessary strength in Japan is "business soldiers". Japanese people have a dream of “dominating the world” in business.
Part 1. It is "RONZA" on January 20, 2020.
A "political" situation that does not allow "the constitutional revision emphasized by Prime Minister Abe".
Do you open a breakthrough in the constitutional revision theory in view of the dissolution of the lower house and the general election?
The Diet was usually convened on January 20.
Issues related to politics and money, such as “public and private confusion” at the “Sakura Viewing Party” hosted by Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, and bribery cases involving the attraction of IRs (integrated resort facilities) including casinos.
For the opposition and the media, "blame" is a "packed" parliament. There is no doubt that the ruling and opposition parties will be heated up for 150 days until June 17.
Despite the alleged Suspicion, Prime Minister Abe is eager to pursue a constitutional revision.
Article 9 of the Constitution has been repeatedly appealing to "specify the existence of the SDF".
In his speech on Tuesday, he said that it was the responsibility of members of the Diet to set out what kind of country Japan would aim for, calling for further discussions at the constitutional review committee.
However, with the LDP Governor's term expiring near the end of fall in 2021, some people within the Liberal Democratic Party have been skeptical about the amendment made by Prime Minister Abe, who is weakening his centripetal force.
The ruling Komeito party is also increasingly cautious.
If we analyze the political situation calmly, it will be impossible for Prime Minister Abe to amend the constitution.
It is Asahi Shimbun "RONZA" on January 20, 2020. b
The SDF exists under the current constitution.
The Self-Defense Forces Act should be amended to provide a self-defense self-defense force based on Article 25 of the Constitution!
Even if you do not amend the constitution, you can have nuclear missiles for self-defense.
If the people agree, a preemptive strike can be made if there is a sign of an attack.
The constitutional amendment is to fight the United States.
Western countries should say "NO" to the Japanese constitutional amendment.
Recovering the occupied Takeshima is possible under the current constitution.
The current constitution should make full use of the right to self-defense.
When saying Article 9 amendment of the Constitution, it should be said after taking back Takeshima in the current constitution.
It does not make sense for a government without the "executive power" of the "government" to "clearly state" the SDF in Article 9 of the Constitution.
If you want to say "talking in sleep", you have to sleep and then say!
Article 99 of the Constitution: The Emperor or the Regent and Minister of State, members of the Diet, judges and other public servants are obliged to respect and defend this constitution.
Please see "bill of indictment" で at the "Site" below.
In this case, only by looking at this "bill of indictment", you can understand the "error of applicable law".
Please see the "English translation" and "Japanese original" PDF.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation in English “Indictment letter of indictment
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be exact, do it yourself.
● Original Japanese `` letter of indictment ''
`` Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese) ''
The English translation is incorrect. Please see the above "PDF" for English translation.
● See related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
2) Penal code
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
Part 2. I'm "appealing" two things.
`` Revised on November 4, 2019 ''
I am not only me, but also Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims of the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to solve it by terrorism.
1. Foreigners engaged in "illegal work" other than "status of residence". But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law, "Illegal labor crimes."
The Immigration Control Law, on the other hand, punishes employees who are "causal" for illegal work under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act (crime for promoting illegal employment).
However, Japanese justice has "punished" only foreigners, but not "employees."
This clearly violates Article 14 of the Japanese Constitution, the principle of equality under the law.
And it violates international law that prohibits "consciously" punishing only foreigners.
If an employer who hired a foreigner illegally is "innocent," a foreigner who has been illegally worked is also "innocent." .
2. The prosecutor "applied" Article 70 and Article 62 of the Penal Code "crimes to support other offenses" to Article 70 of the Immigration Law on the grounds of "Support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law" Wrong with the law. "
“Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law” is the disposal of a person who has obtained a status of residence by making a false application.
In the past, the Immigration Control Law did not punish anyone who obtained a status of residence through a false application (former Articles 70 and 74-6).
The Amended Immigration Control Act was enacted in the 192nd Extraordinary Diet, which stipulated penalties for those who obtained status of residence due to false applications, their employers who assisted them, their workplaces, lawyers, administrative scriveners and school staff.
It has been enforced since January 1, 2017.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippines, a Philippine embassy official" is 100% "innocent."
"Reference": A foreigner has performed an act prescribed in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law (acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents). But there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
Dispositions include "cancellation of status of residence" and "forced deportation" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code" Sin to support other crimes "cannot be applied.
The "reason for crime" in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law pointed out by the "indictment" has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law.
The public prosecutor has "smashed, crush something in one's hand" on the "bill of indictment."
However, "crush something in one's hand" by state power is "stop" of "statutory limitation, statute of limitations".
The materials are below.
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
PS: White House replied to me that she was seriously considering a satisfactory solution to this problem. I am waiting for the result. I hope that there is no lie.
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!