Japan's Justice in the Dark

Please support so that Japan will be governed under the law, fundamental human rights will be protected, and it will become a country complying with international law

To President Trump Violating Nissan's internal regulations is 100% impossible for Carlos Ghosn alone. France, the United States, Brazil and Lebanon should protect "Carlos Ghosn".

To President Trump

2020-03-12: Dear Sirs,
The Japanese government should understand that Carlos Ghosn is not guilty before seeking cooperation. Former Chairman of Nissan Motors Carlos Ghosn fled to Lebanon in the Middle East, `` Deputy Minister of Justice '' said `` Ghosn should be tried in Japan '' and he asked President Aung for help . Violating Nissan's internal regulations is 100% impossible for Carlos Ghosn alone. France, the United States, Brazil and Lebanon should protect "Carlos Ghosn".

Part 1. Nissan Motor is a large public company.
To this end, it is managed in accordance with the rules of the Japan Institute
of Certified Public Accountants and the Tokyo Stock Exchange, and the organizational theory
of business administration.
The purpose is to prevent such incidents from occurring and protect investors and business partners.

Such incidents never occur at listed companies.
That's because the internal “checking function” is working.
The securities report is not "produced" by Carlos Ghosn.
If his request is "violation of the rules", "internal parties" should act in accordance with the rules.
Carlos Ghosn is not directly involved in foreign currency remittances or contracts.
Ghosn should not even know the paperwork of foreign currency remittances.
All involve Nissan's relevant personnel, managers and officers in violations.
And "certified public accountants" also violate.
They did "illegal processing" without pointing out Carlos Ghosn's breach.
The reason is "Sontaku" to Carlos Ghosn.
"Sontaku" (Guesswork) is "GOMASURI".
"GOMASURI" is "suck up" and "Apple Polisher".

In such a case, European and American societies will solve the problem “in-house”.
In Japan as well, we will solve this internally.
The reason is that it is an organized crime, which lowers the value of the company.

This time, Nissan did a plea bargain with the prosecutor, acquitting Japanese "related persons",
Made Carlos Ghosn and Greg Kelly criminals.
The reason is to protect Japan's Nissan from France.
Japan has a constitution "equality under the law".
France, the United States, Brazil and Lebanon should protect "Carlos Ghosn".
International law prohibits "arbitrary" punishment of foreigners.

It is NHK NewsWeb on March 3, 2020.
The Deputy Minister of Justice seeks cooperation with the Lebanese government
on the escape of Ghosn's defendant.
The full text is below.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "bill of indictment" で at the "Site" below.
In this case, only by looking at this "bill of indictment",
you can understand the "error of applicable law".

Please see the "English translation" and "Japanese original" PDF.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation in English “Indictment letter of indictment
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be exact, do it yourself.
● Original Japanese `` letter of indictment ''
`` Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese) ''
The English translation is incorrect. Please see the above "PDF" for English translation.
● See related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
2) Penal code
Penal Code
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan

Part 2. I'm "appealing" two things.
`` Revised on November 4, 2019 ''
I am not only me, but also Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims of the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to solve it by terrorism.

1. Foreigners engaged in "illegal work" other than "status of residence". But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law, "Illegal labor crimes."
The Immigration Control Law, on the other hand,
punishes employees who are "causal" for illegal work under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act
(crime for promoting illegal employment).
However, Japanese justice has "punished" only foreigners, but not "employees."
This clearly violates Article 14 of the Japanese Constitution, the principle of equality under the law.
And it violates international law that prohibits "consciously" punishing only foreigners.
If an employer who hired a foreigner illegally is "innocent,"
a foreigner who has been illegally worked is also "innocent." .

2. The prosecutor "applied" Article 60 and Article 62
of the Penal Code "crimes to support other offenses" to Article 70 of the Immigration Act
for the reason of "Support for Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".
Wrong with the law. "
“Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law” is the disposal of a person
who has obtained a status of residence by making a false application.
In the past, the Immigration Control Law did not punish anyone
who obtained a status of residence through a false application (former Articles 70 and 74-6).
The Amended Immigration Control Act was enacted in the 192th Extraordinary Diet,
which stipulated penalties for those who obtained a status of residence due to false applications,
those who assisted them, workplaces, lawyers, administrative scriveners and school staff.
It has been enforced since January 1, 2017.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippines, a Philippine embassy official" is 100% "innocent."

"Reference": A foreigner has performed an act prescribed in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law
(acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
But there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
Dispositions include "cancellation of status of residence" and "forced deportation"
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code" Sin to support other crimes "cannot be applied.
The "reason for crime" in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law pointed out
by the "indictment" has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law.

The public prosecutor has "smashed, crush something in one's hand" on the "bill of indictment."
However, "crush something in one's hand" by state power is "stop" of "statutory limitation,
statute of limitations".

The materials are below.

There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: White House replied to me that she was seriously considering a satisfactory solution to this problem.
I am waiting for the result.
I hope that there is no lie.

If the URL of the web of the material is shown below, please email me. (Respond a private URL).

Yasuhiro Nagano

For uncertainties, please contact us!