2020-05-20: Dear Sir,
Prime Minister Shinzo Abe described the spread of the new coronavirus infection as "the Third World War." As evidenced by the Prime Minister's words, "China's Chinese People's Armed Police Department (Marine Police Department) ships have repeatedly invaded the territorial waters of the Senkaku Islands. Japan should respond by the Self-Defense Forces. If the SDF does not “execute” its “mission”, it should disband the SDF and entrust it to the US military.
Part 1. Journalist Soichiro Tahara, who met with the Prime Minister, revealed on his blog.
Mr. Tahara exchanged views with the Prime Minister on the new Corona measures
on April 10 at the Prime Minister's official residence.
According to Tahara, the prime minister then said,
"I thought that World War III would probably be a nuclear war,
but I recognize that coronavirus expansion is World War III."
The People's Armed Police Force of China plays a part in the nation's military power
(armed capacity) as a paramilitary organization
(domestic army or national military police) of the People's Republic of China.
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD%E4%BA%BA%E6%B0%91%E6%AD%A6%E8%A3%85%E8 % AD% A6% E5% AF% 9F% E9% 83% A8% E9% 9A% 8A
The 11th Regional Coast Guard Headquarters (Naha) was on the 9th,
when a Chinese Coast Guard ship invaded the waters around the Senkaku Islands
in Okinawa Prefecture at about 4:50 pm on the 8th, approximately 12km west-southwest of Uotsuri Island.
Then, it was made clear that it approached a Japanese fishing boat in operation and tracked it.
The four guards warned that the Japan Coast Guard should leave the territorial waters
and deployed patrol boats around the fishing boats to ensure safety,
and on the 9th they sailed in the connected waters on the territory overseas side around Senkaku,
one like a machine gun. Equipped with
It was the 26th consecutive day that Chinese authorities confirmed ships around Senkaku.
Chinese ships continue to enter the territorial waters for three consecutive days around Senkaku.
On April 10, Kaibo confirmed that two other vessels of the China Coast Guard were operating
in the connected waters on the territory's overseas side.
One of them was equipped with something like a machine gun, and a patrol boat warned
against approaching the territorial waters.
On May 8, offshore of the Senkaku Islands in Okinawa Prefecture,
a vessel of the China Coast Guard that invaded the territorial waters of Japan approached
and followed a Japanese fishing vessel. The site was temporarily tense,
with warnings to move out and the deployment of patrol boats
around Japan to ensure the safety of Japanese fishing vessels.
Chief Cabinet Secretary Suga said,
"In order to prevent the spread of new coronavirus infectious diseases,
close cooperation among the international community, including Japan and China,
is particularly required. I would like to urge the Chinese side to take positive action. "
The Abe administration claims to revise Article 9 of the Constitution,
but the SDF is not an organization based on Article 9 of the Constitution.
An organization that defends against foreign invasion.
The Supreme Court also recognizes the "defense" of the "national land" by the SDF.
The Abe administration is "misunderstanding."
This is my argument.
We should revise the "Self-Defense Forces Act" and make "Rights"
of "Survival" of Article 25 of the Constitution "ground" to define "Self-Defense Forces"
of "Exclusively Defense-Oriented Policy"!
You can have nuclear missiles for self-defense even if you do not revise the constitution.
If there are signs of an attack, you can also do a “first strike”.
It is possible to recapture the occupied Takeshima under the current constitution.
The current constitution should make full use of the "right of self-defense."
If you want to set up a war against a foreign country and want an invasion war,
you need to revise Article 9 of the Constitution.
The act of protecting Japan's land and protecting the "life
and property of the people" is not a violation of Article 9 of the Constitution.
It will continue tomorrow.
Please see "bill of indictment" on the "site" below.
Just looking at this "bill of indictment" in this case, you can understand the "error of applicable law".
Please see PDFs of "English translation" and "Original Japanese".
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● English translation “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano Kin Gungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, please do it yourself.
● Japanese original “letter of indictment”
`` Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese) ''
The English translation is incorrect. For English translation, see "PDF" above.
● See related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
2) Criminal law
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
Part 2. I "come" for two things.
`` Revised November 4, 2019 ''
I am not only me, not only Chinese and Philippine people,
Fighting for many victims of the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to solve it by terrorism.
1. A foreigner has performed "illegal work" other than "resident status". But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act, "Crime of Illegal Labor."
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" for illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act
(a crime that promotes illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but not "employed".
This clearly violates Article 14 of the Constitution of Japan, "the principle of equality under the law."
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "consciously".
If the employer who illegally hired a foreigner is "innocent",
then the foreigner who was illegally worked is also "innocent". ..
2. The prosecution "applied" the "crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and 62 of the Penal Code against "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act",
but "Applied" It's a legal mistake to do. "
“Immigration Law Article 22-4-4” is a disposition of a person
who has obtained a status of residence by a false application.
In the past, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties for persons
who acquired their status of residence through false applications (old law Articles 70 and 74-6).
The revised Immigration Control Act was enacted at the 192nd Extraordinary Diet session,
which targets penal provisions for persons who acquired residence status through false applications,
employers who assisted them, lawyers, administrative scriveners, and school staff.
It is "enforced from January 1, 2017".
"I, KinGungaku, diplomat of the Philippines, staff of the Embassy of the Philippines" is 100% "innocent".
"Reference": A foreigner has performed the actions prescribed
in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act (acquisition of status of residence
by submitting false documents). However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "compulsory deportation" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code," Crime in Supporting Other Crimes ", cannot be applied.
The “reasons of crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
The prosecution has "crushed, crush something in one's hand," "the complaint, bill of indictment."
However, "crush something in one's hand" by the state power is "stop" of "statutory, limitations of limitations".
The materials are below.
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
PS: The White House replied to me that he was seriously considering a solution that I was happy with.
I am waiting for the result I hope that there is no lie.
If the URL of the document's website is as shown below, please email us. (I will reply with a private URL).
Please contact us if you have any questions.