Japan's Justice in the Dark

Please support so that Japan will be governed under the law, fundamental human rights will be protected, and it will become a country complying with international law

To President Biden! The evidence stated in the complaint is the "text of the Immigration Control Act" and the "indictment". The reason for the crime stated in the indictment is stated in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act (Cancellation of statu

To President Biden!



2023-04-04: Dear Sir,  #False_accusation_of_death penalty  #Violations_of_human_rights
Japan's False Accusation: In the "Hakamada Incident" 57 years ago, the prosecu-tion gave up on a "special appeal." Former professional boxer Iwao Hakamada (87) is finally able to "redo" the "judgment". Everyone, please watch over Mr. Hakamada so that he is not killed by Japanese prosecutors.

The so-called "Hakamada Incident," in which a family of four was murdered in Shi-zuoka Prefecture. As a result, more than 40 years after the finalization of the death sentence, a "redo" trial will be held.

"Blood stains" on the "clothing" in the "miso tank" had "redness". The defense team submitted a report of a reproduction experiment in which clothes were soaked in miso as new evidence. An appraisal for color change was also made.

The decision aroused "suspicion" that the clothing had been "miso-pickled" for over a year. It was judged that it was "clear evidence that should be acquitted" neces-sary for a "retrial." "Fresh blood" on clothing turns black after a year. Even monkeys know this.

Asahi Shimbun's editorial: False Accusation of Death Penalty points out that the death penalty cannot coexist with a society that respects human life and dignity. The Diet and the government should look squarely at this and start discussing the abolition of the death penalty. False accusations are the most serious violation of human rights by the state.

In 2010, I was arrested for assisting in a violation of the Immigration Control Act. In January 2012, I was sentenced to 1.5 years in prison. After I was released from prison in March 2013, I began to apply for a "retrial." In my case it's "error of appli-cable law". The evidence is the "indictment" and the "Immigration Law".

A "retrial" for "errors in applicable law" requires proof of "crime" by "police officers, prosecutors, and judges" involved in the investigation. The "crimes" of "police offic-ers, public prosecutors, and judges" are "crime of false accusation by special public servants" and "crime of abuse of authority by special public servants."

Regarding the crimes committed by "police officers, prosecutors, and judges", the crimes against me are "bills of indictment". And the crimes against "Chinese and Fil-ipinos" were submitted to the Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office as an "accu-sation letter". However, the Tokyo District Public Prosecutor's Office will not accept it many times.

In Japan, a "trial" cannot be held unless the prosecutor accepts the crime. Even if a public prosecutor commits a large number of murders, if the public prosecutor de-cides to "not prosecute" the case, it cannot be judged in a "trial."

If the public prosecutor "accepts" the "complaint" and decides not to prosecute, it can request the "investigation board of prosecution" to conduct the review and or-der the prosecution to "indict." So I filed a request for review with the Public Prose-cutor's Office. As expected, the prosecution has not "accepted" the case, so the prosecution review board rejects the request.

I argued that the "criminal act" described in the indictment was described in "Arti-cle 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act" and that the indicated act was not a crime. The prosecutor said, "Who believes you?" Lawyers say, "I specialize in the logic of law."

The evidence stated in the complaint is the "text of the Immigration Control Act" and the "indictment". The reason for the crime stated in the indictment is stated in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act (Cancellation of status of residence).

In other words, if a foreigner obtains a "status of residence" by submitting false documents (a false employment contract) to the immigration office, the Minister of Justice will revoke the "status of residence" as an administrative disposition. You are done.

Therefore, a person who provides false documents to a foreigner cannot be pun-ished for the "aiding crime" of the "Penal Code" for the "work outside the qualifica-tion" of the foreigner. Like me, Chinese and "Philippine diplomats" are being pun-ished. See Part 2 for details.

The "investigating police officer" said: You need to "admit" your "crime" to "general logic" rather than the law. Therefore, Japan can only conclude an extradition treaty with two countries. This is the G7 presidency.


Part 1. Citations and reference materials 
(Editorial) Decision to retrial the death penalty case Promptly rectify the injustice
https://www.asahi.com/articles/DA3S15580194.html
"Hakamada case" prosecution abandons special appeal to start retrial
https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20230320/k10014013721000.html
"Retrial" talks by the former presiding judge who decided to start the retrial of the "Hakamada case"
https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/special/jiken_kisha/kishanote/kishanote65-2/


I will write tomorrow too.

 

"Part 2 (Japan's Abnormal Human Rights Violations)" was revised on February 27, 2023.

Part 2. Japan is a "state of abnormal human rights violations". "Everyone" of the "international community", please help!
First of all, please read "false accusation" in the 2010 "Crime of Supporting Violation of Immigration Law".

Reason for punishment:
A Chinese national obtained a "residence status" by submitting a "false employment contract." And they committed immigration law violations (activities outside of their qualifications).
Because "we" provided "false employment contract documents" to the Chinese, the Chinese were able to obtain "residence status."
The Chinese were able to "live" in Japan because they obtained a "status of residence".
Because the Chinese were able to "live" in Japan, they were able to "work illegally."
Therefore, ``we'' who ``provided'' the Chinese with ``false employment contract documents'' were punished as ``helping'' the Chinese ``activities outside the scope of their status of residence''.
This is an arbitrary "error of applicable law". This is out of the "logic of the law".

My claim:
"1" The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will take an "administrative disposition" (Immigration Control Act: Cancellation of the status of residence) for the act of submitting false documents and obtaining a status of residence. You are now "finished". "Aiding" an act of innocence is innocence.
A Chinese national who has engaged in “2” (activities outside the qualification) is not guilty. The reason is that the "person who hired them" has not been punished for "promoting illegal employment" under the Immigration Control Act. Therefore, by "equality under the law", the Chinese are innocent.

The revision of the Immigration Control Law in December 2016 made it possible to punish the act of "providing" "false employment contract documents".
Implemented from January 2017. According to Article 39 of the Constitution, it is not possible to "retroactively" to the "past" and "punish".
https://www.moj.go.jp/isa/laws/h28_kaisei.html

See "Indictment." The stated facts "state" the "fact" of "not guilty." (Japanese English)
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
"My Appeal" (Japanese)
https://blog.goo.ne.jp/nipponnoasa/e/d28c05d97af7a48394921a2dc1ae8f98
"My Appeal" (English)
https://blog.goo.ne.jp/nipponnoasa/e/ac718e4f2aab09297bdab896a94bd194

"Chinese, Korean, Filipino, American, etc." There are more than tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands of victims all over the world. An unusual number of people.

Prosecutors' "(deprivation) of liberty" is "arbitrary." They are "disobeying the law" and "selfish". They have no "(logical) (necessity)". The prosecution is "punishing" "as they wish".

In 2010, "me and the Chinese" in the immigration violation case, and in 2013, Philippine Embassy staff and diplomats were also punished for the same reason.

"I" argued "not guilty", explaining with "logic of the law".
Police and prosecutors then said, "(You) should admit (your crime) in general terms."
Japan is the only country that punishes in general terms! .
The judge stated "Causal relationship" with crazy "logic". When I "see" (text of the judgment), I "laugh out loud."

This case is an error of arbitrary application of law by police officers, prosecutors and judges. The charges are "abuse of authority of a special public official" and "crimes of false complaints." The prosecution "killed" the "accusation letter" and "accusation letter" by "ex officio." Therefore, the statute of limitations has been suspended.

I am "appealing" two things.
1: The foreigner performed "illegal labor" other than "status of residence". But foreigners are innocent because of "equality under the law".
2: The prosecution “applied” “Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code” to Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds of “support for Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act”. However, it is "error of applicable law". (as above).

Koreans make demands on Japan over the "solved" "comfort women and forced laborers" issue, but should support "tens of thousands of Korean victims" who have been punished for "violating immigration laws." .

The Japanese government is hiding Japan's human rights violations by making up such things as "human rights violations against Uyghurs in China."

"I" am demanding "restoration of honor" and "compensation" for myself, the Chinese, and the Philippine Embassy officials.

Everyone in the world! ! Victims should report to their respective governments. The governments of each country have an obligation to demand the Japanese government to restore the honor of their own citizens and compensate them.


Part 3. Construction of special zones.
The "special zone" "accepts" refugees and immigrants as "temporary immigrant" workers, limiting their residence to the "special zone". Developed countries can use them as low-wage workers for economic growth, and refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful human life.
No2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
No1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

Part 4. Ukraine war.
Zelensky took office on an "election promise" to scrap the Minsk Accords and regain territory through war. But when news of his tax evasion and tax havens came to light, he started a war.
No2: https://ukrainawar.seesaa.net/
No1: https://ukrainian-war.blog.jp/

Part 5. "U.S., Russia, and China" Tripartite Military Alliance/War Show
To create a world without war, we need a “Tripartite Military Alliance”!
No2: https://urc-military.seesaa.net/
No1: https://sangokugunzidoumei.blog.jp//

Part 6. Japan's notorious judicial system and human rights violations
Japan's judicial system: Immigration law violation case False accusation: Nissan Ghosn case False accusation: Abuse at immigration facility: International student/intern student case: Non-interference in domestic affairs: Foreign opinions
No2: https://nipponsihou.seesaa.net/
No1: https://humanrightsopinion.blog.jp/

Part 7. Corona sensor development 
We should develop an "inspection system" that instantly "discovers" "infected persons" like thermography.
https://covid-19-sensor.seesaa.net/

Part 8. North Korea's Abduction and Missile Issues & Taiwan's Defense
https://taiwan-defense.seesaa.net/

Part 9. Promotion of One Coin Union & Hydrogen Vehicles 
https://onecoinunion.seesaa.net/

Part 10. "Nagano" Opinion, Next Generation Nuclear Power: CO2 Free & SDGs: Russia/Ukraine Invasion Issues: Immigration/Refugee Issues: International/U.S. Politics/Taiwan Issues/Unification Church Issues
https://naganoopinion.seesaa.net/


Best regards.

Yasuhiro Nagano

 

It is published in the following program.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any questions, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp