To President Biden
February 3, 2024: Saturday edition. Dear Sirs,
"One China": China's "One China Principle" and America's "One China Policy" are different things. Do you know.
The use of these terms indicates that the US and China have different positions and interests regarding Taiwan, which is a core issue in US-China relations.
In Taiwan's presidential election, which was held on January 13th, Taiwan's Democratic Progressive Party's Kiyotoku Lai was elected president. The Legislative Yuan failed to maintain a majority.
I think that over time, many Taiwanese citizens will become pro-China. I think China should take its time.
Secretary of State Blinken: The United States must maintain peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait and work toward a peaceful resolution that is free from coercion and pressure. moreover. . .
The peoples of the United States and Taiwan, both of whom have democratic values, say they will continue to expand cooperation in areas such as economics and culture.
The Chinese government, which claims that ``Taiwan is part of China,'' has ``condemned'' Mr. Lai as a ``Taiwanese independence supporter.''
This is a form of ``strong opposition'' to the Japanese government's ``congratulations'' to Mr. Yori. The Kishida administration supports Taiwan.
On January 13, when asked by reporters about the results of Taiwan's presidential election, President Biden stated, ``We do not support Taiwan's independence.''
He does not support Taiwan's independence, but wants to say that the United States will treat Taiwan as an ally.
Difference between the "One China Principle" and the "One China Policy". China's "One China Principle" is easy to understand.
However, the US's ``One China Policy'' is difficult to understand because it includes ``ambiguities'' in ``strategic'' terms.
China's "One China Principle" is: (1) "There is only one China in the world," (2) "Taiwan is an inalienable part of China," and (3) "The People's Republic of China" "represents China." do. And China is the "only" "legitimate government."
In the 1970s, many countries ``recognized'' China's ``One China Principle.''
The United States ``recognized'' regarding ③, and ``acknowledged'' China's position regarding ① and ② (the 1978 ``US-China Joint Statement'').
The expression that "Mainland China and Taiwan" both belong to one China is a new usage devised to alleviate Taiwan's opposition.
This phrase became widely used in Taiwan policy documents from the Hu Jintao era onwards.
This usage was first officially used in the report of the 16th Congress of the Communist Party of China in 2002.
It was ``mentioned'' that ``there is only one China in the world, and both the mainland and Taiwan belong to one China, and we will not tolerate division of China's sovereignty and territory.''
The United States' "One China Policy" consists of (1) the three U.S.-China communiqués of 1972, 1978, and 1982, (2) the Taiwan Relations Act enacted in 1979, and (3) President Reagan's declaration toward Taiwan in 1982. It consists of "six guarantees".
On February 9, 2017, President Trump and President Xi Jinping spoke by phone.
"President Trump has agreed to respect our 'One China' policy, as requested by President Xi Jinping," the White House said in a statement.
The Xinhua news agency uses two terms and distinguishes the positions of both parties.
However, since ``policy'' and ``principle'' are listed side by side, it is easy to assume that they are the same thing unless you know the situation well.
Readers would think that Trump said he respects China's "one China principle."
However, the White House release does not include the phrase ``Taiwan is considered part of China.''
The above is an explanation by Yoshiyuki Ogasawara, Professor Emeritus of Tokyo University of Foreign Studies, and my comments.
For more information, please see the difference between the "One China Principle" and the "One China Policy" in "Chapter 1."
Part 1. Citations/reference materials
Taiwan presidential election: Democratic Progressive Party's Lai Ching-toku wins; Legislative Yuan fails to maintain majority
https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20240113/k10014319761000.html
Difference between “One China Principle” and “One China Policy”
https://www.tufs.ac.jp/ts/personal/ogasawara/analysis/one_china_principle_and_policy.html
I'll write tomorrow too.
Part 2. Victims of human rights violations in Japan. "Chinese, Korean, Filipino, American, etc."
There are tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands of victims all over the world. An unusual number of people.
＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊
There are "innumerable" Chinese and Korean victims.
This was "before the war of WW2" because the Chinese and Koreans were "second-class citizens" of Japan, so the judiciary makes them "idiots".
＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊
Everyone, please tell your acquaintances who went to Japan and were arrested for violating the Immigration Law.
It is necessary to demand "governments of each country" to "claim" the Japanese government for "restoration of honor and compensation for damages".
If the government doesn't respond, ask the media for help. "Justice media" will always exist.
You should be a "hero", go for it! !
<Target people>
"1" Provide "false documents" to a foreigner, and the foreigner acquires a "status of residence". And if the foreigner has "illegally worked".
A person who provides "false documents" such as an "employment contract" to a foreigner is innocent.
However, from January 2017, it will be punished by "law revision".
The Chinese and the Philippine embassy staff and diplomats I am 'criminally indicting' are completely innocent. See part 2 for weekdays (Monday to Friday) for details.
``2'' Foreign nationals who have been arrested for ``illegal employment (activities outside of their qualifications'') are ``in most cases'' innocent.***
Reason: The person who "employed" them has not been punished for "promoting illegal employment" under the Immigration Control Act. Therefore, by virtue of "equality under the law," foreigners are innocent.
"Most foreigners" are "deported" with "small" "fines". Foreigners should "claim" the Japanese government for "compensation" of "several million yen" per person.
It is crazy for Koreans to "claim compensation" from the Japanese government for the "comfort women issue" and "requisitioned labor issue." They should claim reparations from the "Korean government". (The Korean government has already received it).
The issue of "violation of the Immigration Control Act" is completely different from the "Japan-Korea Treaty". Therefore, Korean politicians need to "pursue" the Japanese government as a "new Japan-Korea problem". Koreans and Chinese should proudly claim that they are not "Japanese slaves."
Japan's prime minister shouts "rule under the law". They are "talking about Japan" crazy!
Only two countries, South Korea and the United States, have concluded an extradition treaty with Japan.
This is also evidence that Japan does not have a "rule under the law".
See "Indictment." The stated facts "state" the "fact" of "not guilty." (Japanese English)
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
"My Appeal" (Japanese)
https://blog.goo.ne.jp/nipponnoasa/e/f47a69183287f42bf0b6464aedb098cc
"My Appeal" (English)
https://blog.goo.ne.jp/nipponnoasa/e/58d63abf2802f3a9535e5c86fd2387a
I am "Japanese samurai". Japan should be "friends" with people of any country. "NO War"
Part 3. Construction of special zones.
The "special zone" "accepts" refugees and immigrants as "temporary immigrant" workers, limiting their residence to the "special zone". Developed countries can use them as low-wage workers for economic growth, and refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful human life.
No2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
No1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/
Part 4. Ukraine war.
Zelensky took office on an "election promise" to scrap the Minsk Accords and regain territory through war. But when news of his tax evasion and tax havens came to light, he started a war.
No2: https://ukrainawar.seesaa.net/
No1: https://ukrainian-war.blog.jp/
Part 5. "U.S., Russia, and China" Tripartite Military Alliance/War Show
To create a world without war, we need a “Tripartite Military Alliance”!
No2: https://urc-military.seesaa.net/
No1: https://sangokugunzidoumei.blog.jp//
Part 6. Japan's notorious judicial system and human rights violations
Japan's judicial system: Immigration law violation case False accusation: Nissan Ghosn case False accusation: Abuse at immigration facility: International student/intern student case: Non-interference in domestic affairs: Foreign opinions
No2: https://nipponsihou.seesaa.net/
No1: https://humanrightsopinion.blog.jp/
Part 7. Corona sensor development
We should develop an "inspection system" that instantly "discovers" "infected persons" like thermography.
https://covid-19-sensor.seesaa.net/
Part 8. North Korea's Abduction and Missile Issues & Taiwan's Defense
https://taiwan-defense.seesaa.net/
Part 9. Promotion of One Coin Union & Hydrogen Vehicles
https://onecoinunion.seesaa.net/
Part 10. "Nagano" Opinion, Next Generation Nuclear Power: CO2 Free & SDGs: Russia/Ukraine Invasion Issues: Immigration/Refugee Issues: International/U.S. Politics/Taiwan Issues/Unification Church Issues
https://naganoopinion.seesaa.net/
Best regards.
Yasuhiro Nagano
