To President Trump!
Weekday edition, May 2, 2025
This "special zone on the Mexican border" is operated by a "cooperative" in which the "US government and the companies that have moved in" have "invested."
This "cooperative" is a for-profit organization that "constructs and operates" the "special zone," but "does not" pay dividends.
Profits are used to operate the "special zone" and to "provide free food, clothing, shelter, medical care, and education" to "temporary immigrants," while the "labor and welfare costs" of the companies that have moved in are kept to a minimum.
The "cooperative" develops the "special zone," but receives "loans" from the US government for the "development costs."
The "cooperative" repays its "loan from the federal government" from the "sale price" and "rental income" of land such as "factory sites."
The government is responsible for the "wall" and infrastructure around the "special zone." The government is also responsible for public facilities such as parks.
Companies build factories, warehouses, offices and other facilities at their own ex-pense on land sold or rented by the cooperative.
The cooperative receives loans from the government and builds housing for tempo-rary residents. The cooperative pays the loan amount and interest from the coop-erative's "profits."
The cooperative's "profits" are the supply chain system usage fees, sales system usage fees from tenant companies, and rent from stores and shopping centers.
The cooperative recruits volunteers to participate in part of the management and operation of the system free of charge. It also raises funds through crowdfunding.
Companies order raw materials through the cooperative's supply chain (B2B). Raw material ordering is based on the Supply Chain Act.
Factories in the "special zone" are prohibited from ordering from any supplier other than the designated supplier approved by the Supply Chain Act.
Raw materials are brought in through a designated gate. At the gate, inspections are carried out to ensure that illegally imported raw materials are not used.
In principle, companies ship (export) goods through "cooperatives" (B2B).
"Cooperatives" also sell "online" to individuals and (companies) all over the world (B2C).
The "cooperative" system is a common system in "special zones" around the world. The main "special zones" are the Mexican border, Algeria, and the Philippines.
"Special zones" also have "restaurants" and "entertainment facilities". These are run by Americans on the "mainland".
Under the Trump administration, America is "shining brighter". Let's make the American dream come true.
Part 1 References
Trump Administration Plans to Impose Tariffs on iPhones, Especially Focus on American Products
https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/a08d4e899477fd55ce9ffd8172cc1eabf32ffaf5
I will write again tomorrow.
Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".
"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!
First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.
❤Click below to read the full article!
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.
In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.
However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.
As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".
As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.
Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.
In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".
In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) were also arrested.
The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".
<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.
"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)
The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".
If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).
Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.
The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:
1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."
2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).
3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."
4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."
5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."
6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."
This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."
This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.
The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."
My argument:
"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.
"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.
The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."
However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.
The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.
Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.
Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.
Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.
Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.
Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."
NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/
For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.
Thank you.
Yasuhiro Nagano
Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
