For the international community Please condemn the national crime in Japan!
Since the Metropolitan Police Department does not accept crimes as unspecified, not only concrete cases described in complaints and accusations but also infringement of international basic human rights, including prosecution administration regarding violation of immigration laws in the past (illegal employment) There are so, we are applying for relief to each country and the UN Human Rights Council (Geneva) etc.
In case of
Illegality of misappropriation case application law violation of immigration law
Initially, as for the aid to assist illegal employment against the Immigration Control Law violation cases illegally arrested in June 2010, I am aware that the special law "illegal employment promotion crime" as set forth in the Immigration Act, It is the logic of law that gives priority to the aid of the criminal law which is the general law, and it is completed with this law from the standpoint of complying with international law prohibiting arbitrary disposal to foreigners, under the law, law And that the application of the criminal law assistance crime was a violation of applicable law.
In addition, although the application of the criminal law aid for the reason of the illegal employment of the Chinese content, the application of the criminal law aid for the reasons of providing a false employment contract is an error in the applicable law and claimed to be illegal, the Tokyo District Prosecutors' "I dismissed it.
So, as we asked for support from the international community, the problem became bigger, not only for me, Chinese, Filipino, but also for illegal judicial administration against illegal immigration law against many foreigners including the past (illegal employment) Arbitrary disposition of foreigners to foreigners has evolved into an international human rights violation issue.
The four Chinese offenders accept illegal work, but illegal employment is not established only by foreigners.
Illegal work Illegal work Illegal employment is established because there are operators illegally hiring foreigners who want to work illegally. It is exactly the same logic as the prostitution prevention law. Therefore, I think that you can understand the purpose of creating "illegal employment promotion crime".
My argument is that no businesses hiring foreigners who are not eligible to work are not disposed of as "illegal employment promotion crimes" prescribed by the Immigration Control Act without any fault. If so, illegal employment will not be established, so foreign employees who are employed are also innocent of not blaming them. And there is no assistant of any kind.
In addition, against the illegal employment, apart from the facts, the act of providing 'Contents false employment contract' made residence qualifications easier, so I was able to live in Japan, so because of crime It is clear that application of guilty guilt for illegal employment is a violation of applicable law.
Although details will be described later, the Immigration Control Act stipulates the type of status of residence and the scope of activities, but the conditions for granting status of residence are not stipulated by law, and the conditions for granting status of residence are, in various situations, Because it is delivered in private at the discretion of the Minister of Justice so as not to contravene the national interests of Japan, one citizen can not transcend discretionary power of the Minister of Justice.
It is not the Minister of Justice but the Foreign Minister that we are in Japan (permitting entry). This is also a non-public standard, the Foreign Minister is to decide at the discretion, one citizen can not exceed the discretion of the Foreign Minister.
It is not uncommon for the Minister of Foreign Affairs to not affix a seal on the passport even if the Minister of Just grants a residence permit. On the contrary, there is no disclosure of reasons, and no significance is admitted. Therefore, it can not be said that the residence permit was made easy.
Therefore, even if the former offender submitted a false employment contract to acquire the status of residence, the causal relationship is separated from illegal work, and the Minister of Justice rescinded the residence permit as administrative penalty and overseas I am stipulating the provision to withdraw from the Immigration Control Act.
Furthermore, because the international community is paying attention to Japan, it is an insult, a prejudice against foreigners, to conclude that a crime has been made, it is a big discrimination.
As stated above, application of the criminal law aid for illegal employment is a criminal act by violation of the applicable law. The offense of the police officer, the prosecutor, the judge, etc. is the "criminal charges of false charges" of the criminal law and it is "crime of abuse of the special public officer's authority."
"Crime of abusing ex official authority of a special civil servant" is a crime established by abusing its authority and arresting and imprisoning others. Criminal composition requirement of official abuses of special public officials As to the suitability,
① The subject is a special civil servant, · · · facts It is a policeman, a prosecutor, a judge.
② Having arrested and confined a person ... ... It was arrested and confined as a fact.
③ abuse of authority, established by. · · · · It is whether I abused the official authority,
Abuse is the means by which illegal exercise of authority on duties means that means and methods are not only violent and threatening, but also intention to accept the results against victims legally and virtually It is supposed to be sufficient if it is one that puts pressure on freedom of decision.
For example, for police officers, the criminal procedure law (Act No. 131 of July 10, 1947) Chapter 1 Investigation Article 189
Police officers perform their duties as law enforcement officers according to other laws or by the National Public Safety Commission or the prefectural public safety commission.
○ 2 When a judicial police official thinks that there is a crime, it shall investigate the criminal and evidence.
In case of
I have stated many times that crimes are not being imagined.
Why are crimes not imagined? That is because it is an arbitrary application violation.
That is why we are putting in detail the fact of illegal application law violations where crime is not imagined.
Even if you do not need willfulness, there is still unexpected as a specialist at law.
"Special public officials did not know the law" is not allowed.
In case of
As stated in complaints of complaints and complaints of accusation letters, illegal contents Contents of freedom of decision making are exercised by expressing arrest warrant of false (application law violation) and exercise authority on duties.
Criminal offense is established because this obvious illegal act is abuse of official absence because abuse of special officials abuses their intentions does not require deliberation.
False accusation, for the purpose of subjecting the punishment or discipline to others, and the contents of the act of a false complaint.
It is a deliberate criminal, a desired criminal, and "a purpose to make a person receive criminal or disciplinary action" is necessary. In fact, I received a fine of 1 million yen, imprisonment for a year and a half, and I was released on maturity without admitting parole. The Chinese who was considered as an accomplice have also been fined or sentenced to imprisonment (execution suspension).
Also, the public prosecutor is unaware of the authority of office, crime constituent requirements and immigration law, the reason for returning complaints and accusations is no longer a confident organized crime.
The Immigration Control Law requires not only aliens who work illegally, but also employers as "punishment promoting offenses against illegal employment" not to disregard international law by disposing equality and foreign nationals under the law arbitrarily "We are strictly punished.
However, even in this case, because the business is not disposed of as "illegal employment promotion crime", it is not equal under the law, only foreigners are arbitrarily criminalized, so it is a violation of international law.
Because it does not dispose of the business who hired illegally, foreigners who were working illegally must also be acquitted.
Because there was no illegal employment, there are no assistants of that illegal employment.
The detention facility of the Metropolitan Police Department that the complainant was imprisoned was overflowing with the arrest of illegal work. It is not uncommon for illegal stay for over 10 years.
In many cases, we will not dispose of employers even with arrest for illegal employment promotion because of circumstances, so illegal residents among illegal foreigners who have illegally worked will be allowed to leave the country without a criminal remedy so, It is deportation abroad.
The problem is illegal employment of legitimate residents staying in a study abroad visa etc. Regular qualifications, in many cases, contrary to international law, only foreigners are criminalized by fines or the like contrary to equality under the law, causing arbitrary departure from the country is.
What is even worse is that in this case, in order to impose fairness under the law and criminalize only foreigners arbitrarily with imprisonment without compromising international law, they assist the substitute for the assistant of "illegal employment promotion crime" I made up a person. Here is the malignancy of this case.
The act of saying that the contents of false employment contracts indicated by counsel is obviously not related to illegal employment but refers to the act of assisting the cancellation of the status of residence of 22 Article 4-4 of the Immigration Act.
As the Minister of Justice granted it at the discretion of the ministerial ordinance, the status of residence by submitting false documents stipulates that the status of residence will be canceled as the administrative penalty of the Minister of Justice. Therefore, point of counsel is irrespective of illegal employment, it is a violation of applicable law.
Giving a status of residence is not a provision of the law, so that the disposition of the act of rescission of the status of residence, such as submitting a false document, such as Article 4, Article 4 of the Immigration Control Act, can be seen by the Minister of Justice ' Because it was granted at the discretion of the Minister of Justice, it is against the logic of the law to make a criminal disposition. Therefore, at the discretion of the Minister of Justice, it is taking administrative measures to leave the country.
By nulla poena sine lege of the Constitution Article 31, it does not imposed the punishment must depend on any person established in the National Assembly law.
In the judgment, it is assumed that the act of providing a false employment contract made easy to obtain the status of residence, but the condition for granting the status of residence is not the provision of law but also the ministerial ordinance (Detailed Immigration Law) which is the only guideline , To establish a graduation qualification of the relevant university etc, to be hired with the same salary as Japanese.
The condition of granting is not disclosed and it can not be said that the act of providing a false employment contract to the status of residence issued at the discretion of the Minister of Justice has made it easier for the status of residence.
Submission of an employment contract is required by the section manager. To criminalize a crime under the criminal law aided by making it easy to acquire a status of residence, it is illegal without the grounds of the law stipulated in Article 31 of the Constitution.
Everyone in the international community!
Some lawyers say that based on the training at the Judicial Research and Training Institute, the offense is a prison sentence, so anything is unreasonable or unreasonable, so anything can be said that assistance charges will be established on the grounds of assistance acts . It is said that this is a judicial judgment in Japan.
After all, as this country seems not to be ruled under the law, whether it is said that it is one of the Japanese and "opinion", after all, I organized this problem here and violated the applicable law I will assert.
In the logic of the law, principals were working illegally, since the businesses that were illegal employment is innocence, principals is not guilty. (Although it is illegal, it has been conventionally deported as a fine and sent overseas)
Though ... there are no persons were illegal employment, there can not be there are only those who were working illegally.
If the former offense is innocent, the criminal assistance charges will not be established.
Here to a problem, illegal employment is, in the same way as the Anti-Prostitution Law, is a truism to established because there is business to be working illegally. I must pursue this.
Equality under the law, contrary to international law, only foreigners who have been illegally worked will receive criminal penalties for imprisonment or imprisonment and be removed from the country!
And for any act that is not innocent, it is applied in criminal law assistance crime in general theory!
As soon as possible, we will comply with the international law ratified by the National Assembly, become a country that will be governed and punished under the law established in the Diet, claiming that the basic human rights of the citizens and the people of the world will be protected, Please listen.
I. Introduction
Punishment for illegal employment under the Immigration Control Act stipulates to dispose of illegal workers for illegal workers and illegal employers for illegal employment promotion crimes.
Originally should be completed by applying this law, contrary to the legislative purpose of the Diet, do not punish the businesses illegally arrest and detain only foreigners, criminal disposition arbitrarily with illegal work crimes It is illegal, contrary to international law.
Also, in this case, it is an illegal judicial administration contrary to Article 31 of the Constitution, as it applied the crime aid assistance criminalization, referring to the aid act of canceling the status of residence without any causal relationship with illegal employment.
In this case, the judicial officials collaborated with the press and manipulated the information, publicize the public as if arrested because they did the act prescribed in "illegal employment promotion crime" to the public, but the indictment is a guilt on murder In the same way as applying, in response to the illegal employment of the Immigration Control Law, foreigners will have a principle theory of insulting foreigners that they will always commit crimes if they stay in Japan, if the wind blows, The crime aid for assistance of the penal law which is the law is abused.
Businesses who illegally worked were not criticized, foreigners who were forced to work illegally were arbitrarily punished by "illegal workers crime" contrary to international law, and they were forcibly abandoned.
Businesses that illegally worked are not punished at all, and this is an arbitrary act prohibited by international law. It is not a country governed under the law. It is not a country that complies with international law.
While developed countries in the world are suffering from immigration problems, the Japanese government still plays a violation of human rights not only for Japanese but also for people all over the world in an illegal way as a criminal and forced to leave the country abroad There is.
In my case and the Philippine Embassy case, I am applying criminal law aid to me and diplomats for the reasons of assisting illegal work against "illegal work" irresponsibility of "dismissal of status of residence" for illegal employment . It is exactly the same as North Korea. Japan must be a country governed under the law.
Regarding illegal employment, in order to protect the employment opportunities of the Japanese, the National Assembly punishes foreigners for illegal work and pays them for illegal work, and as a special law as a special law, Article 2 of the Immigration Act 73 illegal employment Promotion guilt "has been enacted. The Diet must correct the judicial administration which ignores legislation, but will not attempt to rectify it.
For an outline of the incident, please see the separate sheet "Violation of Immigration Act (Aid Association) Summary Memo").
The case abused the guilt of assistance of the general law, and Article 31 of the Constitution, "No one is deprived of its life or freedom unless it is based on the procedure prescribed by the law, or can not impose any other punishment" On the contrary,
Despite being unlistedly granted at the discretion of the Minister of Just, despite the fact that the documents requested to be provided by the section chief notice are false, it is concluded that the status of residence was easily obtained, but ... Aside from whether or not you got a status of residence by submitting false documents,
Working within the given status of residence is not illegal work (activities outside the status of qualification)
Despite the fact that the acts that work outside of the given status of residence are illegal employment (activities outside the status of qualification)
I have applied criminal aid for illegal work for illegal employment because I insulted foreigners' human rights when I made a criminal act (illegal employment) because I made it to be in Japan without any causal relationship.
The provision of the law refers to the law established by the National Assembly (including the ordinance established by the local council in the precedents).
In an effort to punish foreigners only arbitrarily without punishing business operators, they conspired with the mass media, cheated on international law, pretense citizens appear to have arrested assistants by illegal employment promotion charges,
On the other hand, we are applying illegal workers' crimes by misusing the immigration laws of citizens and foreigners, making up an assistant for illegal work by a crime aid for the criminal law of the general law in place of a business who made illegal work. I will.
Despite the provision of the status of residence is not the provision of the law but the Minister of Just gives it at the discretion, because it provided false employment contracts, it is possible to make it easy to acquire the status of residence of technology and humanities internationally It was. I was able to stay in Japan because I got my status of residence. I was able to work illegally because I was able to live in Japan. I abused the crime aid assistance crime with a causal relationship which has nothing to do with illegal employment, but it is illegal out of the logic of law.
As if by law, the provision of employment contracts is based on the criminal law award as the absolute requirement for granting status of residence, but there is no provision in the Immigration Control Act (Principle) regarding the conditions for granting status of residence.
The only ministerial ordinance (by-law), the Minister of Justice has established university etc graduation qualification (academic background) as a condition for giving international residence qualifications of technology and humanities at the discretion. Therefore, the submitted documents are "diplomas" to prove their educational background.
However, even if it is false with this, because it gives the status of residence at the discretion, it can only do administrative measures to cancel the status of residence.
"Content false employment contract" written in the indictment complies with the smooth administration of immigration administration because it requests submission by the section manager, not by the law, and the one stipulated in the law It is not an absolute document of granting status of residence, and since the condition of granting itself is unpublished and it is given at the discretion of the Minister of Justice, it is easy to acquire the status of residence in light of the provision of Article 31 of the Constitution For reasons, it can not be said that it is enough documents to impose penalties.
This is obvious from the fact that the act of submitting false documents is taken as administrative penalty for cancellation of status of residence at the discretion of the Minister of Justice.
The status of residence is given to the individuals of the Japanese nation by foreign nationals and restricts employment within the status of residence, but the work place is not a company providing employment contracts, so it is free to work at any company or organization And immigration and explained that a company that issued an employment contract and has concluded an employment contract after the Minister of Justice granted a status of residence to a foreigner can not detain the place of work for foreigners .
In the Immigration Control Law, as a countermeasure in the event of obtaining a status of residence by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice has stipulated a provision to cancel the status of residence,
It is obvious that if you work in a qualified position you will not be illegally employed.
The reason why the former offender was illegally employed is because I worked outside the status of residence.
The causal relationship of illegal employment is illegal act of a business operator who worked in a job outside the status of qualification. As punishment including penalty for illegal employment, there is a provision of punishment under Article 2 of Immigration Act 73 as a promoting act, so it is given priority over the criminal law bailout guilt of the general law, and the application of criminal law aiding criminal act is law It is obvious that it violates the logic.
Under the Immigration Control Act, it is stipulated that illegal employment practices should be dispose fairly with illegal workers' incentives and illegal employment promotion crimes.
Regarding submission of false documents, since the Minister of Justice has granted the status of residence at the discretion, the Minister of Justice stipulates that the submitter, its assistant and the person who has suggested it, should be administrative punishment for withdrawal from overseas.
As a result, it is proved that there is no causal relationship between illegal employment practice and act of rescission of status of residence.
II. The causal relationship of application of assistance is to insult foreigners' human rights.
Apply force aided criminal aid forcedly without applying "illegal employment promotion crime" stipulated as an aid / promotion act against illegal employment Contents Contribution of false employment agreement facilitates acquisition of status of residence I was able to live in Japan. Because it was possible to live in Japan, it is said that the illegal employment was able to be made and the causal relation between provision of false employment contract and illegal worker's crime is clear, ignoring special law, ignoring international law, It is an indictment that ignores human rights and abuses assistance charges and is a judgment.
It is absolutely forbidden for the international community to live in Japan because it made it possible for residents to live in Japan so that they could have committed a crime (illegal employment outside the status of qualification) because of the prejudice that if a foreigner lives in Japan, It is a malicious discrimination against an arbitrary alien who abused the crime.
Contents of false employment contracts could facilitate the acquisition of status of residence and could live in Japan if permitted causal relationship of such assistance crime. Because I was able to live in Japan, I could assume that the murderer could be killed and that the causal relationship of murder was clear, but it is a terrible thing that is not allowed by the law of law,
The interrogation officer said, "President, Chinese have worked illegally, so we can financially assist illegal work ... but if the Chinese were murderers, it would be an assistance crime against murder charges! Please do it! "
We are already applying "assistance crime" against homicide. We must pursue this with the help of the international community.
If you think that Japanese who treat foreigners equally is not interesting, they apply criminal charges and make them criminals. The root of infringement of human rights is because the custom of exclusion of arbitrary foreigners is rooted.
In case of
Even if you are in Japan, your employment within the status of residence is natural and there is no causal relationship with illegal work (crime) at all.
It seems to be bad,
It is self-evident that it became illegal employment because he worked outside his / her status of employment, and that the causal relationship was a business employing foreign nationals who are not qualified for work prescribed in the illegal employment promotion crime.
Also, even if you obtain a status of residence with false contracts of employment, it is self explanatory that when you work within the scope of your status of residence, you will not be illegally employed.
The only obvious is that the Minister of Justice provides that immigrants who have obtained a status of residence with false documents can cancel their status of residence under the Immigration Control Act.
Since it will be applied without illegal work, obviously there is no causal relation with illegal employment.
Because it is contrary to the logic of the law that it is judged as administrative punishment rather than criminal disposition, because it gave discrimination rather than regulation of the status of residence of the status of residence, it is to make administrative penalty of cancellation of status of residence at the discretion .
Police officials, prosecutors, judges, lawyers, etc., have been granted the status of residence (entry permission) by identifying the status of residence qualified by the Minister of Justice and the entry permit (visa) by the Minister of Foreign Affairs I am misunderstanding.
Grant of status of residence and entry permit (to be in Japan), that is, a seal on the passport (entrance visa) is separate, and even if a status of residence is granted, an entry permit (a seal) is obtained in the passport If not, I can not live in Japan.
The immigration permission is granted at the discretion by the Minister of Foreign Affairs to foreigners who have obtained status of residence from the Minister of Justice, and this was also granted at the discretion, and a visa (a seal on the passport) was granted What you can not afford is common.
The entry permission criteria for immigration visas has not been disclosed, and we do not disclose the reasons for non-permission, and we can not file appeals.
The reasons for visa nonpermission are listed on the homepage as a general theory and there is no other choice but to understand that unless forged passports are forged, it corresponds to reasons not contributing to the national interests of Japan. I think this is true not only in Japan but also in many countries.
An employment contract without legal grounds, a powerless Japanese who was powerless influenced the discretion of the Minister of Justice and the Foreign Minister and made foreigners in Japan! It is self explanatory that it can not be asserted.
Even if you submit a true diploma or content of false employment contract or other documents and apply for a status of residence, the immigration officers can conduct necessary on-the-spot investigations without the court's permission, etc. for review, such as " The right to investigate "has been given, and exercising those authorities, diploma certificates prescribed by the ministerial ordinance satisfied the conditions for giving important skills and humanities international qualifications, so in consideration of various, at the discretion, legal It is reasonable to guess that the Minister has granted a status of residence.
Even if we decided to join the company, we frequently protest to revoke the status of residence at the immigration because it is common to not enter the company, but the granted status of residence was granted to foreign individuals, As long as you are in the qualification, you are free to work anywhere, and it was tightly guided that immigration can not be restrained after immigration has been granted. In case of
So, when I am canceling an employment job office with Lehman shock, I have not informed the immigration. Some lawyers say that at this time, from the immigration office, if they receive the official document of the above-mentioned purpose, it is said that no assistance criminal charges will be established, but at such time the immigration will respond with an official document Is it thing?
Even if you submit false contracts of employment and get the status of residence of international or technical skills, working within the scope of residence status is not illegal. This is self explanatory.
I was illegally employed (activities outside the status of qualification) because I worked outside of the given qualifications. Because there was a business operator to work outside the status of qualification. This is also a trivial idea.
It is obvious that it is a crime of arbitrary violation of the applicable law to summarize the criminal assistance crime, contrary to the purpose of the illegal employment promotion crime.
Although it seems awful, there is absolutely no causal relation between obtaining the status of residence of international technology and humanities at discretion from the Minister of Justice and illegal employment.
At the discretion of the Minister of Foreign Affairs, there is absolutely no causal relation between having been able to live in Japan with an entry visa (visa) and illegal work.
In case of
Even if you are in Japan with a status of residence by obtaining a status of residence by submitting a non-false employment contract you are illegally employed if you do illegal work (activities outside your qualification).
If you had granted a status of residence by false employment contract, the Minister of Justice can cancel the status of residence according to Article 4 4 of Immigration Act 22, so this is also not causally related to illegal work.
The Immigration Control Act prohibits foreign workers who have illegally worked as illegal workers, illegally working businesses who illegally work illegally by promoting illegal employment, not to comply with international law against illegal employment (activities other than qualification) It is impossible to say that it is not equal under the law to punish arbitrarily only illegal foreigners who are illegally worked by illegal work because they have not punished any illegal workers, It is contrary to law.
For many years, Japan has been forcing foreigners to work illegally arbitrarily for a long time, and if it is not convenient, Japan is expelling only foreigners arbitrarily as criminals. It is a completely disgraceful act.
In lieu of law experts, police officers, prosecutors and judges who obliged employers to provide illegal employment, instead of the assistants prescribed for promoting illegal employment, attributed to the fact that they provided false employment contracts and made up as false deceiters for illegal employment ,
For foreigners, they were charged with illegal work as a result of illegal work as a result of being assisted by fraudulent assistants,
Applying the criminal law aiding criminal charges against illegal workers for fraudulent offenders is a common act of judicial judgment in Japan, but it can be said to be an extremely criminal act of crime internationally.
As a result of the above, it is self-evident (innocence) that no one has worked illegally if no one has punished him for illegal employment for promoting illegal employment. Therefore foreigners who work illegally are innocent. Then you will be innocent (not guilty) that no one is available for any illegal work.
III. At the end
Police officers at the Metropolitan Police Department will press a confession saying "accept in general theory."
The prosecutor of the Tokyo District Public Prosecutor's Office on the interrogation said, "I am great, I admit fine if I admit it, imprisonment if I do not accept", and I will compel confessions.
Although it can not be said that it is a judicial administration of a state that advocates freedom and democracy, such as criminal disposition in general theory, this is unfortunately the actual situation of Japanese judiciary.
And, in order not to let the prosecution review committee review the prosecution's non-prosecution action, it is the abuse of prosecution monopolistism and not seizing the prosecution letter / complaint as non-prosecution, squeezing it as unacceptable because the prosecution administration in Japan is.
Even at trial, the prosecutor asserts that transfer payment with family name "Kin" to Refco is proof from "Gold Military" as proof that intention was aided in assisting the prosecutor.
Chinese people, such money is cash is common sense. Indeed it is declared that it is not 100% to do the name transfer by bank transfers with "Kin only by surname". The Chinese always have their first and last name set.
In case of
However, I am not concerned with such facts, but as Japan has been governed under the law, protecting basic human rights including foreigners and becoming a country that comply with international law, Article 31 of the Constitution of Japan I am pursuing with the legal theory.
It seems awful, in the Immigration Control Act regulating the treatment of foreigners, it is the national proposition to abide by the international law which is the treaty approved by the Diet under the Constitution.
In contrary to the legislative intent of the National Assembly that adheres to international law for many years, Japan has not punished businesses that illegally worked against illegal work against international law, against illegal employment, against penalties for illegal employment , He punished only foreigners arbitrarily with fines and imprisonment for illegal work and punished them for deportation.
This case is larger than the Japanese abduction issue by the North Korean government and the Japanese comfort women issue by the Japanese army, and the number of foreign victims is enormous.
If the Japanese government adheres to international law, apologizes to foreigners arbitrarily disposed of, and promptly restores honor and compensation, the international credit of Japan will be damaged and bear great cost to posterity It becomes.
国際社会のみなさま 日本の国家犯罪糾弾してください！
警視庁は犯罪が特定されないとして受理しないので、告訴状・告発状記載の具体的事件だけでなく、過去の入管法違反（不法就労）に関する検察行政も含めて、国際的な基本的人権の侵害でありますので、各国および国連人権理事会（ジュネーブ）等に救済を申出ているところであります。
入管法違反幇助事件 適用法誤りの違法性
私は２０１０年６月に不法に逮捕された入管法違反幇助事件について、当初は、「不法就労」に対する幇助罪については、入管法に定めた、特別法である「不法就労助長罪」が、一般法である刑法の幇助罪より優先するのが法の論理であり、法の下での平等、外国人への恣意的な処分を禁じた国際法を順守する立場から、この法律で完結すべきであり、刑法幇助罪の適用は適用法違反であると主張したのです。
さらに、中国人の不法就労に対して、内容虚偽の雇用契約書の提供を理由とした刑法幇助罪の適用は適用法誤りであり、不当であると主張したが、東京地検は「持論である」として退けたのです。
それで、国際社会に支援を求めるにつれ問題は大きくなり、私や中国人、フィリピン人だけでなく、過去を含めた多くの外国人に対する入管法違反（不法就労）に対する、不法な司法行政によって、多くの外国人に対する恣意的な処分が、国際的な人権侵害問題に発展したのです。
中国人４人の正犯は不法就労を認めていますが、不法就労は外国人だけでは成立しません。
不法就労は不法に働きたい外国人を不法に雇用する事業者がいるから不法就労が成立するものです。まさに売春防止法と同じ論理です。よって「不法就労助長罪」の創設趣旨が理解できると思います。
私の主張は、働く資格のない外国人を雇用した事業者は何れも、お咎め無しで、入管法が規定する「不法就労助長罪」で処分されていません。そうであれば、不法就労は成立しませんので、雇用された外国人もお咎め無しの無罪です。そして如何なる幇助者も存在しないということです。
また、不法就労に対して、事実は別として「内容虚偽の雇用契約書」を提供する行為が、在留資格資格の取得を容易にしたから日本に在住できたので、犯罪ができたとの理由での、不法就労に対するほう助罪適用は、適用法違反であることは明白です。
詳しくは後述しますが、入管法は在留資格の種類と活動範囲を定めていますが、在留資格の付与条件は法律で定めておらず、在留資格の付与条件は、諸般の情勢の中で、日本国の国益に反しないように非公開で法務大臣の裁量で交付するものですので、一国民が法務大臣の裁量権を超越することはできません。
また日本におられるように（入国許可）するのは、法務大臣ではなく外務大臣です。これも非公開の基準で、外務大臣が裁量で決定することであり、一国民が外務大臣の裁量権を超越することはできません。
法務大臣が在留許可証を交付しても外務大臣がパスポーに証印をしないことは珍しいことではありません。これに対して理由の開示は一切ありませんし、意義は一切認めていません。よって在留許可を容易にしたとはいえません。
したがって、正犯が仮に、内容虚偽の雇用契約書を提出して在留資格を取得したとしても、不法就労とは因果関係は切り離されており、これには法務大臣が行政処分として在留許可を取り消し国外退去させる規定を入管法に定めております。
さらに国際社会が注目しているのは、日本におられるようにしたから犯罪ができたと断定するのは外国人に対する偏見である侮辱であり、大きな差別であります。
前記したとおおり、不法就労に対して刑法の幇助罪適用は、適用法違反による犯罪行為です。警察官、検察官、裁判官らの罪名は刑法の「虚偽告訴罪」であり、「特別公務員職権乱用罪」です。
「特別公務員職権濫用罪」は、その職権を濫用して、他人を逮捕、監禁することによって成立する罪です。特別公務員職権濫用罪の犯罪構成要件該当性については、
①主体が特別公務員であること、・・・・事実 警察官、検察官、裁判官です。
②人を逮捕・監禁したこと 、・・・・事実として逮捕・監禁されました。
③職権を濫用したこと、によって成立します。・・・・職権を濫用したか否かですが、
濫用とは、職務上の権限を不法に行使することで、その手段や方法は、暴行・脅迫だけでなく、法律上・事実上、被害者に対してその結果を受け入れざるえない程度に意思決定の自由を圧迫するものであれば足りるとされています。
職権ですが、例えば警察官については、刑事訴訟法（昭和二十三年七月十日法律第百三十一号）第一章 捜査 第百八十九条
警察官は、それぞれ、他の法律又は国家公安委員会若しくは都道府県公安委員会の定めるところにより、司法警察職員として職務を行う。
○２ 司法警察職員は、犯罪があると思料するときは、犯人及び証拠を捜査するものとします。
私は、これまで何度も、犯罪が思料されないことを述べて来ました。
なぜ犯罪が思料されないか？それは恣意的な適用法違反であるからです。
それで、犯罪が思料されない不法な 適用法違反の事実を、詳細にのべているわけです。
故意を必要としなくとも、少なくとも法の専門家として未必の故意があります。
「特別公務員らが法律を知らなかった」は許されません。
告訴状、告発状の告訴事実にに記載のとおり、不法な内容嘘偽（適用法違反）の逮捕状を提示するなどして意思決定の自由を圧迫し職務上の権限を行使しています。
特別公務員職権濫用罪は故意を必要としていませんので、この明らかな不法な行為は、職権乱用であるので、犯罪は成立します。
虚偽告訴罪は、他人に刑罰や懲戒を受けさせる目的で、虚偽の告訴をする行為を内容とします。
故意犯、目的犯であり、「人に刑事又は懲戒の処分を受けさせる目的」が必要です。事実、私は罰金１００万円、懲役１年半の実刑を受け、仮釈放をも認めず満期釈放されました。共犯とされた中国人も罰金や懲役刑（執行猶予）を受けております。
また、検察官が、職務権限、犯罪構成要件や入管法を知らないわけがなく、告訴状・告発状の返戻し行為の理由は、もはや確信的な組織犯罪です。
入管法は、法の下での平等そして外国人だけを恣意的に処分して国際法に反しないように、不法に働く外国人だけでなく、雇用者を両罰規定の「不法就労助長罪」で厳しく処罰しています。
しかし、この事件でも事業者は「不法就労助長罪」で処分されていませんので、法の下での平等でなく、外国人だけを恣意的に刑事処分していますので国際法違反です。
不法に雇用した事業者を処分しないので、不法就労した外国人も無罪としなければなりません。
ということは、不法就労はなかったのですから、その幇助者も存在しないのです。
告訴人が収監された警視庁の留置所は、不法就労の逮捕者で溢れかえっていました。不法滞在１０年以上も珍しくありません。
多くの場合、情により雇用者を不法就労助長罪で逮捕さえせず処分しませんので、不法就労した外国人の内、不法滞在者は、刑事処分せずとも国外退去させられるので、入管送りで国外強制退去です。
問題は、留学ビザなどで滞在する正規の滞在者の不法就労です。正規の滞在資格は、多くの場合、国際法に反して、外国人だけを、法の下での平等に反して罰金刑などで刑事処分をして、恣意的に国外退去をさせているのです。
さらに悪質なのは、この事件では、法の下で公平、そして国際法に反せずに、外国人だけを恣意的に懲役刑で刑事処分するために、「不法就労助長罪」の幇助者にかわる幇助者をでっち上げたのです。ここに、この事件の悪質性があります。
訴因で示す、内容虚偽の雇用契約書を提供したと言う行為は、明らかに不法就労とは関係なく、入管法の２２の４条の４在留資格取消の幇助行為を指しております。
法務大臣が裁量により省令の基準で付与したので、虚偽の書類提出による在留資格は、法務大臣の行政処分として在留資格を取消することを規定しています。したがって訴因の指摘は、不法就労とは関係なく、適用法違反です。
虚偽の書類を提出するなどして、入管法の２２の４条の４在留資格取消行為の処分が、法務大臣による国外退去処分でわかるように、在留資格の付与は、法律の規定ではなく、法務大臣の裁量で付与したものであるから、刑事処分にすることは法の論理に反するからです。それで法務大臣の裁量で国外退去の行政処分としているのです。
憲法３１条の罪刑法定主義により、何人も国会で成立した法律によらなければ刑罰を科されないのです。
判決では、内容虚偽の雇用契約書を提供した行為が在留資格の取得を容易にしたとするが、在留資格の交付条件は法律の定めではなく、唯一の指針である省令（入管法細則）でも、関連する大学等の卒業資格を定め、日本人と同等の給与を受け雇用されることです。
交付条件は非公開であり、法務大臣の裁量により交付した在留資格に対して、内容虚偽の雇用契約書を提供した行為が在留資格を容易にしたとは言えません。
雇用契約書の提出は課長通達で求めるものです。在留資格の取得を容易にしたとして刑法幇助罪で刑事処分するには、憲法３１条で定める法律の根拠がなく違法です。
国際社会の皆さん！
一部の弁護士は、司法研修所での研修を根拠に、正犯が懲役刑なので、不当であろうと、理不尽であろうと、なんでもいいから幇助行為を理由にすれば幇助罪は成立すると言う始末です。これが日本の司法だと言うのです。
やはり、この国は、法の下で統治されていないようですので、日本人の一人とし、「持論」だと言われようが、やっぱり私は、ここに、この問題を整理して適用法違反を主張します。
法の論理では、不法就労した正犯は、不法就労させた事業者が無罪なので、正犯は無罪です。（不法ですが従来は罰金刑で処分して国外強制退去してきたのです）
・・・・不法就労させた者がいないのに、不法就労した者だけがいるはずがありません。
正犯が無罪であれば、刑法幇助罪は成立しません。
ここで問題とするのは、不法就労は、売春防止法と同じ様に、不法就労させる事業者がいるから成立するのは自明の理です。このことを追及しなければなりません。
法の下での平等、国際法に反して、不法就労させられた外国人だけが、なぜ、罰金刑や懲役刑の刑事処分を受け、国外退去されられるかです！
そして、なんら罪にならない行為に対して、一般論で刑法幇助罪を適用されるかです！
一日も早く、国会が批准した国際法を遵守し、国会で成立した法の下で統治され処罰される国となり、国民や世界の民の基本的人権が守られることを主張しますので、耳を傾けてください。
Ⅰ.総論
入管法の不法就労に対する処罰は、不法就労した外国人を「不法就労罪」で、不法就労させた事業者を「不法就労助長罪」で処分するように規定されております。
本来この法律を適用することで完結すべきですが、国会の立法趣旨に反し、事業者を処罰せず外国人だけを、不法に逮捕監禁し、恣意的に不法就労罪で刑事処分を行うことは、国際法に反し不法です。
また、この事件では、不法就労とは何ら因果関係のない在留資格取消の幇助行為を指して、刑法の幇助罪を適用したので、憲法３１条に反する不法な司法行政です。
当事件では、司法関係者はマスコミと共謀し情報操作をして、国民には「不法就労助長罪」に規定する行為をしたので逮捕したように広報するが、起訴状は殺人罪に対する幇助罪適用と同じように、入管法の不法就労に対して、外国人は日本に在留すれば必ず犯罪をするという外国人を侮辱する原則論をたて、風が吹けば桶屋が儲かる論法で、一般法である刑法の幇助罪が乱用されております。
不法就労させた事業者はお咎め無しで、不法就労させられた外国人は、国際法に反して、恣意的に、「不法就労罪」で刑事処罰されて、国外強制退去になっています。
不法就労させた事業者は、なんら処罰されない状況が続いており、これは国際法が禁じている、恣意的な行為です。これでは、法の下で統治されている国とは言えません。また国際法を順守している国とは言えません。
世界の先進国が移民問題で苦しんでいる中、日本政府は今も、日本人だけでなく世界中の民に対して、不法な方法で、犯罪人にして国外強制退去させる人権侵害を加えているのです。
私の事件やフィリピン大使館事件では、不法就労に対して不法就労とは何ら関係ない「在留資格取消処分」の幇助行為を理由に、私や外交官らに刑法の幇助罪を適用しています。まさに北朝鮮と同じことをしているのです。日本こそ、法の下で統治される国にしなければなりません。
不法就労に対して、国会は、日本人の雇用機会を守るため、外国人を不法就労罪で処罰し、事業者らの幇助・助長行為について、特別法として入管法７３の２条「不法就労助長罪」を制定しています。国会は、立法を無視する司法行政を正さなければなりませんが正そうとしません。
事件の概要については、別紙「入管法違反（幇助）事件 まとめメモ」をご覧ください。
当事件は、一般法の幇助罪を乱用し、憲法３１条、「何人も、法律の定める手続によらなければ、その生命若しくは自由を奪はれ、又はその他の刑罰を科せられない。」に反し、
在留資格の付与条件は非公開で法務大臣の裁量で付与されるにも関わらず、課長通達ごときで提供を求めた書類が虚偽であるから在留資格を容易に得られたと断定するが、・・・・・虚偽の書類を提出して在留資格を得たか否かは別として、
与えられた在留資格内で働くことは不法就労（資格外活動）ではなく、
与えられた在留資格外で働く行為が不法就労（資格外活動）であるにも関わらず、
何ら因果関係のない、日本におられるようにしたから犯罪行為（不法就労）したと、外国人の人権を侮辱する理由で不法就労に対する刑法幇助罪を適用しています。
法律の定めとは、国会で制定した法律（判例では地方議会で制定した条例も含む）を指します。
事業者を情により処罰せずに、恣意的に外国人をだけを処罰しようとして、マスコミと共謀し、国際法を騙して、国民には不法就労助長罪で幇助者を逮捕したように見せかけ、
裏では、国民や外国人が入管法に疎いことを悪用し、不法就労させた事業者に代わり、一般法の刑法幇助罪で不法就労に対する幇助者をでっちあげることで、不法就労罪を適用しています。
在留資格の付与条件は法律の規定ではなく法務大臣が裁量で与えているにも関わらず、内容虚偽の雇用契約書を提供したから、技術や人文国際の在留資格を容易に取得させることができた。在留資格が得られたので日本に在留できた。日本に在住できたので不法就労ができた。として、不法就労とはなんら関係のない因果関係で刑法幇助罪を乱用しましたが、法の論理に外れ不法です。
あたかも、法律で、雇用契約書の提供が在留資格付与の絶対条件のごとく、刑法幇助罪の適用根拠としているが、在留資格の付与条件について、入管法（本則）では何ら規定はありません。
唯一、省令（細則）で、法務大臣は裁量で技術や人文国際の在留資格を与える条件として大学等の卒業資格（学歴）を定めています。したがって重用な提出書類は学歴を証明する「卒業証書」です。
しかし、これとて虚偽であったとしても裁量で在留資格を与えるので、在留資格取消の行政処分にしかできません。
起訴状に書かれた「内容虚偽の雇用契約書」は、法により提出を求められるものではなく課長通達で提出を求めるので入管行政の円滑な運営に協力したものであり、法律に規定するものではなく在留資格付与の絶対書類とは言えず、また交付条件そのものが未公開で法務大臣の裁量で付与するものですから、憲法３１条の規定に照らして、在留資格の取得を容易にしたとの理由で、処罰を科すほどの提供書類とはいえません。
このことは虚偽の書類提出行為を法務大臣の裁量によって在留資格取消の行政処分としていることからも自明の理です。
在留資格は日本国家が外国人個人に与えるものであり、在留資格内での就労制限をするが、就労場所は雇用契約書提供の会社でなく、どこの企業、団体で就労するこうは自由だと入管は説明し、法務大臣が在留資格を外国人に与えた以降、雇用契約書を交付し、雇用契約を締結した会社は、外国人の就労場所を拘束することはできないと指導してきました。
入管法では、虚偽の書類を提出して在留資格を得た場合の対処として、法務大臣は在留資格を取消す規定を定めていますが、
当該資格内の職で働いていれば、不法就労とはならないことは明白です。
正犯が、不法就労となったのは、在留資格外で働いたからです。
不法就労の因果関係は、資格外の職で働かせた事業者の不法行為です。その処罰は、不法就労に対するほう助を含めた助長行為として、入管法７３の２条で処罰規定があるので、一般法の刑法ほう助罪よりも優先されるもので、刑法幇助罪の適用は法の論理に反することは明白です。
入管法では、不法就労行為については、不法就労罪と不法就労助長罪で公平に処分することが規定されております。
また、虚偽の書類提出については、法務大臣が在留資格を裁量で付与したものですから、法務大臣が提出者とそのほう助および教唆した者を国外退去の行政処分にすることが規定されています。
以上により、不法就労行為と在留資格取消行為とは、なんら因果関係がないことが証明されます。
Ⅱ.幇助罪適用の因果関係は外国人の人権を侮辱するものです。
不法就労に対しての幇助・助長行為として定められた「不法就労助長罪」を適用せずに、無理やり刑法幇助罪を適用して、内容虚偽の雇用契約書の提供が在留資格の取得を容易にし、日本に在住できた。日本に在住できたので、不法就労ができたとして、内容虚偽の雇用契約書の提供と不法就労罪との因果関係は明白であるとするが、特別法を無視し、国際法を無視し、人権を無視し、幇助罪を乱用した起訴であり判決です。
国際社会が絶対に許せないは、日本に在住できるようにしたから犯罪（資格外の不法就労）ができたとするのは、外国人を日本に在住させれば必ず犯罪をするという偏見で、幇助罪を乱用した恣意的な外国人に対する悪質な差別です。
こんな幇助罪の因果関係を許していれば、内容虚偽の雇用契約書の提供が在留資格の取得を容易にし、日本に在住できた。日本に在住できたので、殺人できたとして、殺人罪の因果関係は明白であるとするであろうが、法の論理では許されない恐ろしいことですが、
取調べの警察官は、「社長、中国人が不法就労したから、不法就労に対する幇助罪で済むけど・・・・中国人が、殺人をしていたら、殺人罪に対する、幇助罪ですよ！気をつけてくださいよ！」と言いました。
既に殺人に対する「幇助罪」を適用しているのです。国際社会の力を借りて、このことも追及しなければなりません。
外国人を平等に扱う日本人を面白く無いと思えば、幇助罪を適用し犯罪者にしているのです。人権侵害の根本は、恣意的な外国人排除の習慣が根付いているからです。
日本におられたとしても在留資格内での就労は当然であり、不法就労（犯罪）との因果関係はまったくありません。
くどいようですが、
不法就労となったのは、在資格外で就労したからであり、その因果関係は不法就労助長罪で規定する働く資格のない外国人を雇用した事業者であることは自明の理です。
又、仮に内容虚偽の雇用契約書で在留資格を得たとしても、在留資格の範囲で就労した場合は不法就労とならないことも自明の理です。
唯一、明らかなのは、入管法で法務大臣は、虚偽の書類で在留資格を得た外国人は在留資格の取消ができると規定しています。
不法就労をしなくとも適用されますので、明らかに不法就労とは因果関係がありません。
刑事処分でなく行政処分としているのは、在留資格を法律の規定ではなく裁量で与えたので、刑事処分とするのは法の論理に反するので、裁量で在留資格取消の行政処分とするものです。
警察官、検察官、裁判官、弁護士らは、法務大臣による在留資格の付与と、外務大臣による入国許可（ビザ）を同一視して、在留資格の付与イコール日本におられる（入国許可）と勘違いしています。
在留資格の付与と、入国許可（日本におられるようにする）、つまりパスポートへの証印（入国査証）は別もので、在留資格が付与されてもパスポートへに入国許可（証印）が得られなければ日本に在住することはできません。
入国許可は、法務大臣より在留資格を得た外国人に対して、外務大臣が、これも又、裁量で与えるもので、入管より在留資格は付与されたが、査証（パスポートへの証印）が得られないことは、よくあることです。
入国査証の許可基準も公開されていませんし、不許可の理由開示はしませんし、異議申し立てもできません。
査証不許可の理由は一般論としてホームページに列挙されていて、パスポートなどが偽造でなければ、日本国の国益に資さない理由に該当すると理解するしかありません。これは日本だけでなく多くの国々でも同様だと思います。
法律的根拠の無い雇用契約書で、権力を持たない無力の一日本人が、法務大臣や外務大臣の裁量に影響を与え、外国人を日本におられるようにした！と断言できないことは自明の理です。
真の卒業証書や内容虚偽の雇用契約書、その他の書類を提出し、在留資格の申請をしたとしても、入管職員には審査にあたり、裁判所の許可無く、必要な立ち入り調査ができるなど「事実の調査権」を与えており、それらの権限を行使して、省令が規定する卒業証書で重用な技術や人文国際資格の付与条件が充足していたので、諸々を勘案して、裁量により、法務大臣は在留資格を付与したと推測するのが妥当です。
入社を内定しても、入社しないことはよくあることで、何度も入管に在留資格を取消すように抗議していましたが、付与した在留資格は、外国人個人に与えたものであり、資格内であれば、どこで働こうと自由であり、入管が在留資格の付与後は、外国人の就労を拘束できないと、きつく指導されていました。
それで、リーマンショックで入社内定を取消す際、入管には連絡していません。一部の弁護士は、この時、入管より、前記の趣旨の正式文書を受けていれば、幇助罪は成立しないと言いますが、入管はこのような時、入管の見解を公式文書で回答するものでしょうか？
仮に内容虚偽の雇用契約書をも提出して、技術や人文国際の在留資格を得たとしても、在留資格の範囲内で働くことは不法就労とはなりません。このことは自明の理です。
不法就労（資格外活動）となったのは、与えられた資格外で働いたからです。それは資格外で働かせる事業者がいたからでです。このことも自明の理です。
よって不法就労助長罪の創設趣旨に反して、刑法幇助罪を摘要するのは恣意的な適用法違反の犯罪であることは明白です。
くどいようですが、法務大臣より裁量で、技術や人文国際の在留資格を得たことと、不法就労とはまったく因果関係はありません。
外務大臣より裁量で、入国査証（ビザ）を得て日本に在住できたことと、不法就労とはまったく因果関係はありません。
仮に内容虚偽でない雇用契約書を提出して、在留資格を得て、入国査証を得て日本にいても、不法就労（資格外活動）をすれば不法就労です。
仮に内容虚偽の雇用契約書で在留資格の付与をしたのであれば、法務大臣は入管法22の4条の4により在留資格取消すことができるので、これも不法就労とはまったく因果関係はありません。
入管法は不法就労（資格外活動）に対して、不法就労した外国人を不法就労剤で、不法就労させた事業者を不法就労助長罪で平等に、国際法にも反しないように処罰規定を設けていますので、不法就労させた事業者を何ら処罰せずに、不法就労させられた外国人だけを恣意的に不法就労罪で処罰するのは法の下で平等とは言えず、国際法に反する行為です。
日本は、長年にわたり、現在も、外国人を恣意的に不法就労させ、都合が悪くなれば、外国人だけを恣意的に犯罪者にして国外追放しているのです。まったく破廉恥な行為です。
法の専門家である警察官、検察官や裁判官が不法就労助長罪で規定する幇助者に代わり、内容虚偽の雇用契約書を提供したと因縁をつけ不法就労に対する罪名虚偽の幇助者としてでっちあげ、
外国人に対しては、罪名虚偽の幇助者の幇助を受け不法就労をしたとして不法就労罪を科し、又、
罪名虚偽の幇助者に対して、不法就労罪に対する刑法幇助罪を適用することは、日本の司法の常識とはいえ、国際的には極悪非道な犯罪行為と言えます。
以上により、不法就労助長罪で処罰する不法就労させた者がいないのであれば、不法就労した者もいないのは自明の理で（無罪）です。よって不法就労した外国人は無罪です。そうすると、如何なる不法就労の幇助者もいないこと（無罪）になります。
Ⅲ.終わりに
警視庁の警察官は「一般論で認めろ」と自白を迫ります。
取調べでの東京地検の検察官は「私は偉いんです、認めれば罰金、認めなければ懲役刑」と言って自白を強要します。
一般論で刑事処分するなど、自由と民主主義を標榜する国家の司法行政とは言えませんが、残念ながらこれが日本の司法の実態です。
そして、検察の不起訴行為を審査する検察審査会を機能させないように、起訴独占主義を悪用して、起訴状・告訴状を不起訴とせずに、不受理として握りつぶすのが日本の検察行政です。
公判でも、検察官は、幇助に故意があった立証として、レフコ社への「キン」なるファミリーネームでの振込入金は、「金軍学」からだと断言します。
中国人は、こうした金は現金が常識です。まして銀行振込で振り込み人名を「姓のみの キン」で行うことは、１００％ないと断言します。中国人は常に姓名がセットになっているのです。
しかし、私はこのような事実関係でなく、日本が法の下で統治され、外国人をも含め基本的人権を守り、国際法を遵守する国になるように、日本国憲法３１条のもと、法律論で追及しているのです。
くどいようですが、外国人の処遇を規定する入管法においては、憲法の下で、国会が承認した条約である国際法を順守することは、国家の命題です。
日本は、長年、国際法を順守する国会の立法趣旨に反して、司法行政は独裁で、不法就労に対し、国際法に反して、不法就労させた事業者を不法就労助長罪で処罰せずに、外国人だけを恣意的に不法就労罪により罰金や懲役刑で処罰し、国外退去させてきたのです。
この事件は、北朝鮮政府による日本人拉致問題や日本軍による従軍慰安婦問題よりも大きく、外国人犠牲者の数は甚大です。
日本政府は、国際法を順守し、恣意的に処分した外国人に謝罪し、そして名誉回復と賠償を速やかに行わなければ、我が国の国際的信用は毀損され、後世に大きな代償を背負わせることになるのです。
