To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister
2019-04-17: There is no need for expensive "Mexico border walls" to protect the desert.
We need a “wall” to protect the “factory”
by making the “Mexico” along the Mexico border!
I want the US Democratic Party to agree.
Greetings. I think it is necessary to construct the "Mexican Wall"
which President Donald Trump "claims".
However, it is a "question" to build expensive "walls" to protect the American desert.
Ironically, if the "humanitarian wall" to protect the trespassing Mexicans
from "death in the desert", would the US Democrat agree?
I will propose.
Create a "special zone" along the Mexican border
in order to make the United States a factory again in the world.
In the "special zone" we "accept" the "poor people"
from Central and South America as "temporary immigration".
"Temporary immigration" will be "employed" at "special zone" factories as "low-paid workers".
A "wall" is necessary to protect the factory in this "special zone".
Not to protect the desert, it is a wall to protect the factory.
Until the wall is made,
I do "Reconnasissance flight" with "Apache helicopter" as "training"
of the US military "actual battle".
When the US military finds an "intruder",
it "shoots" "Threat" to arrest the "intruder".
The House of Representatives, led by the US Democratic Party,
said on April 5 that the administration's promotion of the "wall construction"
of the "Mexico border" based
on President Trump's "National Emergency Declaration" violates the US Constitution.
The issue of the Mexican border has "developed" into the "US House of Representatives"
and the "Court battle" of the "Republican Administration".
The US economy has grown by relying on illegal workers.
Many say they have been working on the problem of illegal workers.
If the government abolishes "illegal immigration",
"US workers" will be unemployed, the company may "bankrupt"
and "economy" may become "Reduction".
The "presence" of illegal immigrants supports the US economy through "field labor" such as farms,
landscaping and construction, "factory labor" such as food processing,
and "labor in service such as restaurants" .
These labors are labor that whites dislike.
Does President Donald Trump want to say that these "work" should be done by white workers?
If you say something like this, the next presidential election will definitely be missed.
President Donald Trump is a career of a great businessman.
So two years ago, the president insisted on coexistence with "illegal immigrants."
The US illegal immigration problem is different from the European immigration problem.
I claim to rule under the law.
The current "illegal immigration" should be considered for legalization.
It is "incompetence" to continue contradictory policy.
I will continue tomorrow
I will continue until you understand.
I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights violation by the Japanese government.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand,
the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act
(a crime that promotes unlawful work).
However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".
If the employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then the illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no “person who has supported other crimes of criminal law”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines, a Philippine embassy official" is not guilty.
2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes"
in Article 60 and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4
of the Immigration Control Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.
Foreigners have acted as defined in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Article 60 of the Criminal Code and Article 62,"
Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" have no causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
The logic of the law is totally wrong.
The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".
The documents are below.
There are many victims in the world.
Please "help" many "victims" with "Brave and Justice."
I urge the Japanese government to "recover the honor"
and "compensate for the victims".
Best regards. Nagano Yoshihiro
The UK should leave the EU unconditionally, respect the referendum and show the example of the democratic nation to the world.
Since many foreigners have been sacrificed in the Immigration Control Violation Case, please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."
Please contact us if you have any questions.