SOS opinion To President Trump
President Donald Trump will become “a hero who unifies the Korean peninsula”
by attacking South Korea in partnership with North Korea.
It is necessary to unify the Korean peninsula before the US presidential election.
The international community should pay close attention to the “strategy”
of President Donald Tran and Secretary Kim Joo Eun.
Part 1. In this case, the “landscaping company” will not be “punished”
by the Immigration Act Article 73-2 “Crime to Promote Unlawful Employment”.
However, it is illegal to “punish” only Philippine diplomats and staff
for criminal reasons that are not related to violations of Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The “crime reason” of “bill of indictment” is
that the Philippine people violated Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law
and obtained status of residence.
It describes the fact that a Philippine diplomat
or employee “issued” a “false employment contract”
and “supported” the Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act.
This is Prime Minister Abe's “governance under the law”.
Even Article 31 of the Japanese Constitution is ignored.
Article 31. No person shall be deprived of his life or freedom or be punished
by any other punishment unless he follows the procedures prescribed by law.
Article 31. No person shall be deprived of life
or liberty, nor shall any other criminal penalty be imposed,
except according to procedure established by law.
It is illegal to “punish” only Filipinos who have been made “illegal workers”
without “punishing” “criminals under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act”.
This violates the “Equality under the Law” of the Constitution of Japan.
It also violates international law.
They should be acquitted.
“Support” under Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act cannot be “criminal”
with “reason for crime”
Applying the “Sin of Support” in Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code
for violations of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act is a “breach of applicable law”.
In other words, “False charges”.
Prosecutors still do not understand this logic.
You can understand that Japanese immigration administration is in a “rotten state”.
I ask everyone.
Please introduce an international jurist who can explain the logic
of this law to the Japanese government.
Continue to next week.
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
2) Criminal law
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural that terrorism resolves. But crazy.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers who are “causal”
of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.
2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds
of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.
A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.
The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.
The materials are below.
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
My information ******
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!