Japan's Justice in the Dark

Please support so that Japan will be governed under the law, fundamental human rights will be protected, and it will become a country complying with international law

To President Trump 2019-09-19: Dear Sir, I also email politicians every day. I received an email anonymously today.


To President Trump


2019-09-19: Dear Sir,
I also email politicians every day.
I received an email anonymously today.
The subject line is “Please stop delivering valueless, meaningless, stupid emails”.
The outgoing address is free mail. It cannot be deleted from the list.
He doesn't want to say "name".
This is the skill of Japanese politicians.
They are paid about 100 million yen a year from tax.


Part 1. We will first “publish a“ Parliamentary member's free mail ”,
which interferes with the rights of Japanese citizens. “Rhy85876@tuofs.com”.
I don't think this "anonymous mail" will be used again.
Since this e-mail is sent to many international communities,
people concerned will “identify” the “politician of this e-mail address”.
I hope this fact will be recorded.
This also leads to “clarification” of “darkness of Japan”.

This case does not "criminally punish" employers
who illegally hired foreigners who are not eligible to work
under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act.
And only “foreign labor” foreigners are “criminally punishable”
under Article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
This crime is a deliberate crime.
The reason for this crime is the crime that police officers just made "I want to brag
about" the results of their arrest.

The truth is the administrative disposition of deportation.
In the “Indictment”, “Illegal punishment” is pointed out
by pointing out “disposition act” and “supporting act”
of “Revocation of status of residence” in Immigration Act 22-4- (4).

The act of “Illegal Labor” under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act is confused
with the “disposal act” of Article 22-4-4 “Revocation of Status of Residence”.

Only the Philippines were made Article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
However, employers are not arrested under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act.
Instead they were made criminals.
Philippine embassy officials and diplomats are “supporters”
of the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4, but they were made criminals
under Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code for Article 70 “Illegal Work Crimes”.

This is the fact that you “play” the law “privately”.
This is a historical fact in the history of crime in the Japanese judiciary.
This is a completely “shameless” “terrible crime”.

The person who `` provided '' the `` false documents ''
in Article 22-4 (4) of the Immigration Act to those
who violated the Immigration Act Article 70 became the supporter
of Article 70 `` Illegal Employment Crime '' .

Please do not mistake the supporter of the Immigration Act Article 70.
What must not be mistaken is not “supporter”

in Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act, but “supported” in the Immigration Act 22-4- (4).
It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.


Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Law (crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds
of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


My information ********

 

Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano

 


For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

********