To President Trump
2019-09-23: Dear Sir,
It is expected that “Prosecution reform” will be implemented
in Korea with the appointment of a new Minister of Justice.
Eliminating prosecutor crimes is the same in Japan.
Prosecutors and judges' “abuse of power” “destroy” democracy.
I hope the White House will “revive” into a “democratic leader”.
Part 1. Violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Law of “Principal offender” is true.
However, employers (helpers) have not been punished under the Immigration Act Article 73-2.
This is a "deviation" for "Discretion". It is a violation of international law.
The prosecution says that the person
who provided the “false document” to the “principal offender” is an “Assistance crime”
in violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
We claim Immigration Act 22-4- (4) as "reason for crime", but it is "error of applicable law".
This applies to "abuse of authority by special public officer".
The Supreme Court's “judgment example” does Arrest and confinement,
so “intentional proof” is not required.
Prosecutors should "accept" a "letter of complaint".
The following explains "a false name whose contents are false".
I will say the “conclusion” first.
The trial will be based on a “letter of complaint”.
The “reason for crime” in “letter of complaint” is described
in Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act “Disposition of obtaining visa status
by submitting false documents”.
In “letter of complaint”,
“false document” is “document of employment contract with false content”.
Foreigners who violate Article 22-4- (4) of Immigration Law will receive the
following “disposition” from the Minister of Justice.
1) Cancel visa status.
2) Forced to leave the country.
Foreigners who have “Assisted” or “abetmented” Article 22-4- (4)
of the Immigration Control Act are subject to the same treatment as “Principal offender”
in the 2010 Immigration Control Amendment.
There will be no punishment before the revision.
“Principal offender” that violated Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act has already been punished. (1 year and a half in prison).
Employers are not punished by the Immigration Act Article 72-2.
This “bill of indictment” is an “indictment” to judge “an aider”
of Article 70 “Foreigners who did labor other than qualifications”
in the Immigration Control Act.
“Proposed facts” by the prosecutor is a crime for “supporting” Article 22-4- (4)
of the Immigration Act.
However, Article 22-4- (4) of Immigration Law cannot be punished as described above.
Immigration Law Article 22-4- (4) states “Administrative Disposition”
by the Minister of Justice.
So I insisted that the content is "the name of false sin."
The following are claims of prosecutors and judges who deviate from the "logic of law".
The judge's allegations are described in the judgment document.
In the “judgment document”,
“the act of supporting Article 22-4- (4)
of the Immigration Act” says “the activities outside the qualification
of Article 70 of the Immigration Act” and “the causal relationship is clear”.
It will continue tomorrow.
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
2) Criminal law
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.
2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds
of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.
A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence”
and “forced relocation” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes” in Articles 60
and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.
The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.
The materials are below.
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!