To President Trump
2019-06-28:Dear Sirs, Foreigners are in violation of Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act because there are “employers”
who hire foreigners who are not eligible to work.
I think that the employer who hired illegally is bad when saying "which one is bad".
It is “Japan's Black Darkness” that employers do not dispose of.
You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4
Part 1. Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act strictly punishes
both the "business company (company)" and the "employee's individual"
under the "both punishment rules" for those who employ illegally.
I think that the fact that three people illegally worked
in the landscaping company is unmistakeable.
However, neither the "company" nor the "employee responsible"
in the landscaping store that hired them has been punished.
To punish only foreigners violates "equality under the law".
It is against international law because it is "arbitrary" to punish
only vulnerable foreigners without equally disposing of illegally employed employers.
It is unfortunate that even the Ministry of Foreign Affairs was involved
in the act of reducing Japan's international status.
I say why such stupid thing was made.
Even in this case, the prosecutors "create" a third party who "supports" "illegal work."
The third party is the person who supported Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act.
The prosecution “punished” those who did “illegal work”
and those who “helped” “illegal work”.
So the prosecutor's office said, "It does not violate equality
under the law" and "In international law it is not arbitrary punishment"
It's totally crazy.
Yet they do not acknowledge this fact.
So, those who "helped" "illegal work" are the household servants
and the officials and diplomats who falsely provided false false employment contracts.
This is an act to support the Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act of the Philippine people.
But if you have a little legal education, you know that it is a crime
and you should "stop" and "stop".
In addition, you should not report such false false news.
It will continue next week.
Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.
1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor
with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).
However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".
If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.
2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.
Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
nd Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship
with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.
The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".
The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
My information ******
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
******
