2019-10-24: Dear Sir,
Japan accepts many foreigners. This is because companies lack labor. “Justice officials” conclude that foreigners come to Japan to commit crimes. The prosecutor said verbally. It is described in the judge's “judgment”. “Woman with strong makeup” is criminalized as “prostitute”.
Part 1. There is no law that treats women with “high makeup” as “prostitutes”.
However, the Japanese police "make up" the law.
The prosecutor forcibly links violations of Article 70 of the Immigration Act
and Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act.
The judge's verdict is as indicted.
The judge describes the relationship in the “decision document”.
1) Philippine embassy officials
(drivers and diplomats) provided a “false employment contract” to Filipinos
who violated Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
2) The Philippine people applied for "residence status" to the immigration office,
attaching a "false employment contract".
3) So Filipinos could easily “acquire” the status of residence.
4) So Filipinos were able to stay in Japan.
5) So the Philippine people were able to violate Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
Therefore, “the causal relationship
between the act of providing a false employment contract
and the violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act is clear.”
In my case, this is clearly stated in the “Causality” section
by Judge Okabe of the Tokyo District Court.
Since it is open to the public on the web, please take a look.
If the `` reason '' of such `` if the wind blows the bucket makers prosper '' is allowed,
the part of `` I was able to work illegally because I was able to stay ''
“Because I was able to stay there, I was able to“ murder ”.”
And it can also be a “crime of support” for “murder crime”.
This is a scary story.
The “premise” is that foreigners are coming to Japan to commit crimes.
(Kaze ga hukuto okeya ga moukaru = if the wind blows the bucket makers prosper)
It will continue tomorrow.
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
2) Criminal law
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.
2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds of “support
of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.
A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.
The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.
The materials are below.
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
There are many American victims. I have seen this with my eyes.
If the prosecution does not arrest the employer, the Americans are not guilty.
The United States government should claim restoration and compensation
for the honor of Americans.
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."
Please contact us if you have any questions.