Yasuhiro Nagano Opinion
Sunday, January 26, 2020: Dear Sir,
Carlos Ghosn has refuted the Minister of Justice Mori. She completely ignores "putative innocence". Denying "estimated innocence" is the basis of Japanese judicial administration. In my case, even 1mm does not violate Japanese law. So the police and prosecutors said. "You should" accept "" your sins "in" general theory. " International community! ! I am still fighting. Help, just like Carlos Ghosn.
Part 1. This is the Mainichi Newspaper on January 22, 2020.
Former Nissan Chairman Carlos Ghosn, 65, who fled to Lebanon,
renewed his Twitter on January 21 for the first time in about nine and a half months.
Former President Ghosn had limited access to the Internet while on bail in Japan, but his fleeing Lebanon does not.
A contribution to (FT) was published on January 21 and criticized the Japanese judicial system
under the title "I am a victim of double standards and" disinformation. "
This is a rebuttal to the justice of the Minister of Justice Mori, who said to the fleeing former Ghosn,
"I should prove innocent in court."
"This completely ignores the presumption of innocence and the burden of proving crime,
which is the basis of a just modern judicial system."
(FT) also posted an article by Law Minister Mori titled "Our system is fair" on the 20th.
Meanwhile, the Ministry of Justice said on January 21 that the criticism
of long-term detention before the exile of defendant Carlos Ghosn
of Nissan Motor Co., Ltd., raised international criticism
and said that Japan's judicial system was "not a hostage justice." And commentary on Q & A format
Published in
A total of 14 Q & As are available in English.
The question that Japan may be subject to long-term detention is that the period of detention
in Japan is necessary and reasonable.
The official who wrote this is not an official engaged in actual judicial work.
What the Ministry of Justice official writes on the website is "just a lie".
In my case, even 1mm does not violate Japanese law.
So the police and prosecutors say, "You should admit your guilt with general theory."
"If I plead guilty, they will fine me," they say.
"If I plead guilty, they will release me immediately," they say.
After all, I was confined for more than a year.
When the judge of the High Court finished the handover, I was released on bail.
For details, see the website of the URL in Part 2.
How long will the Japanese government tell a lie?
I am writing what I experienced.
Continue tomorrow.
Part 2. The Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Investigation Division has "crushed" prosecutors' crimes even
in violation of the Immigration Control Law.
There are many foreigners (countless).
"Everyone" around the world! Help the Japanese government victims around you!
Victims are foreigners who have "worked illegally" in activities other than "eligibility" in Japan.
They have been arrested for "illegal work" under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law
and have been subject to "criminal penalties" such as "a prison term penalty" and "fine penalty."
And they are "forcibly repatriated" foreigners.
I wrote this yesterday.
Prosecutors have arrested a third party for "supporting" the aforementioned "illegal work" of foreigners.
The victims are "I and" Kin Gungaku who are Chinese. ""
Other victims include the staff of the Embassy of the Philippines and diplomats in the Philippines.
I think there are more victims, but I do not know the information.
The person who passed the "employment contract documents" to the foreigner
who performed "illegal work" is a third party.
It has nothing to do with "illegal work".
Prosecutors say in Indictment:
I gave a foreigner "false employment contract documents."
Foreigners could easily obtain "eligibility for residence" by attaching "false employment contract documents."
Foreigners have come to live in Japan because they have obtained a status of residence.
Since foreigners were in Japan, they could do "illegal work."
Therefore, as a crime against Article 70 “Illegal labor” of the Immigration Control Act of a foreigner,
“Article 60 and 62 of the Penal Code” “crime supporting other crimes” is applied.
The “guilty of support” for Article 70 “Illegal Work” of the Immigration Control Law is stipulated
in Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law, “crime of promoting illegal employment”.
The prosecution's "reason for crime" is stipulated in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act,
"Revocation of Status of Residence by Submitting False Documents."
There is no punishment. Only the status of residence is revoked.
And "forcibly repatriated".
Even if you obtain a status of residence with "false documents,"
working within the scope of "status of residence" is not "illegal work."
The application of Article 62 or 62 of the Penal Code to me or a Philippine diplomat is an error
in the "Applicable Law".
This is the perfect False charge.
Victims should apply to governments and media in each country.
Governments and media in each country should ask the Japanese government for "restoration of honor"
and "compensation."
If governments or embassies cannot protest the Japanese government, request an investigation from the ICC.
There are many victims around the world. Please support "ICC suit".
The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
The above translation is inaccurate, please contact us by email.
There are many American victims. I have seen with this eye.
Americans are acquitted if prosecutors do not arrest the employer.
Should claim restitution and compensation for Americans.
Sincerely yours, Yasuhiro Nagano
Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
